⚡️ Speed up method CSVSink.parse_field_names
by 688%
#56
+5
−3
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 688% (6.88x) speedup for
CSVSink.parse_field_names
insupervision/detection/tools/csv_sink.py
⏱️ Runtime :
1.53 millisecond
→195 microseconds
(best of319
runs)📝 Explanation and details
To optimize the
parse_field_names
method in theCSVSink
class for faster execution, we should minimize the use of inefficient operations and redundant calls. Specifically, eliminating the use ofset()
andsorted()
, which can be costly in terms of time complexity, will help improve the performance. We will also use efficient data structures like list comprehension and dictionary operations.Here's the optimized version of the
parse_field_names
method.In this rewritten method.
set()
operations which are inherently more computationally intensive due to their need to handle hash calculations and uniqueness checks.custom_keys
directly with thedetection_keys
while ensuring only unique additions, thereby avoiding unnecessary sorting.Benchmark tests should also be conducted to validate the performance benefits of these changes in realistic scenarios.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details