⚡️ Speed up function time_based_cache
by 23%
#74
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 23% (0.23x) speedup for
time_based_cache
insrc/dsa/caching_memoization.py
⏱️ Runtime :
26.0 microseconds
→21.1 microseconds
(best of5
runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 23% speedup through two key algorithmic improvements:
1. Efficient Cache Key Generation
The original code creates cache keys by converting arguments to strings and joining them:
The optimized version uses native Python hashable tuples:
This eliminates expensive string operations (
repr()
,join()
, list comprehensions) and leverages Python's optimized hash table implementation. Tuples and frozensets are inherently hashable and hash much faster than strings.2. Optimized Cache Lookup Pattern
The original code uses
if key in cache
followed bycache[key]
, performing two hash table lookups:The optimized version uses
dict.get()
for a single lookup:This reduces hash table operations by 50% for cache hits.
Performance Characteristics
These optimizations are particularly effective for:
test_cache_large_number_of_keys
with 1000 repeated calls) - the single lookup optimization shinestest_cache_large_kwargs
with many parameters) - tuple hashing scales better than string concatenationThe optimizations maintain identical functionality while leveraging Python's built-in data structure performance characteristics for substantial speed gains.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_cxb9dv5a/tmpha9c_23p/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_time_based_cache
test_dsa_nodes.py::test_cache_hit
test_dsa_nodes.py::test_different_arguments
test_dsa_nodes.py::test_different_cache_instances
test_dsa_nodes.py::test_keyword_arguments
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-time_based_cache-mdpfsdkm
and push.