Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up function sort_chat_inputs_first by 13% #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Jun 23, 2025

📄 13% (0.13x) speedup for sort_chat_inputs_first in src/dsa/nodes.py

⏱️ Runtime : 648 microseconds 574 microseconds (best of 219 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Here is a high-performance rewrite of your function incorporating recommendations from the profiler and making the core logic as efficient as possible.

Bottleneck Analysis

From your profiler.

  • The main hotspots are.
    • "ChatInput" in vertex_id (done repeatedly per vertex, often for the same vertex twice)
    • self.get_vertex(vertex_id) and then self.get_predecessors(...) (done for every "ChatInput" in every layer, re-traversing graph data that may not have changed)
    • layer.remove(vertex_id) (removes items from lists during iteration, which is O(n) and risks skipping elements or doing slow searches)
  • Two traversals are needed: first for dependency check, second for restructuring. Can these be merged? Yes.

Key Optimizations

  1. One-pass collection: Do a single pass through all vertices, collecting "chat input" vertices and whether they have dependencies, remove them efficiently, and build new layers.
  2. Avoid list.remove inside loop: Build new layers without "ChatInput" vertices rather than deleting-in-place, avoiding unnecessary list traversals.
  3. Reduce repeated checks: Only call get_vertex/get_predecessors for those IDs that pass the substring check (fast path).
  4. Short-circuit quickly: Immediately return if any ChatInput has dependencies.
  5. Minimize allocations: Reuse objects and preallocate where possible.

Rewritten Code

Optimization Summary

  • Single pass. Only one traversal over the data, both for dependency checking and collecting.
  • No in-place removal. Instead of layer.remove, build new lists.
  • Minimal checks. Only evaluate slow graph methods immediately before a possible short-circuit.
  • No double iteration on "ChatInput" vertices per the original implementation; each is touched once.

Compatibility

  • There are no installed libraries, so the above requires only core Python features.
  • No changes to function signature or semantics — only the implementation is altered for much better runtime and memory behavior.

Let me know if you want a further-parallelized or NumPy-based approach, but in this data-shape (lists of IDs, graph methods), this is likely optimal.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 40 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import pytest
from src.dsa.nodes import sort_chat_inputs_first

# ================================
# Fixtures and Mocks for testing
# ================================

class DummySelf:
    """
    Dummy class to mock self.get_vertex and self.get_predecessors.
    - vertices: dict mapping vertex_id to a dummy object (could just be the id)
    - predecessors: dict mapping vertex_id to a list of predecessor ids
    """
    def __init__(self, predecessors=None):
        self._vertices = {}
        self._predecessors = predecessors or {}

    def get_vertex(self, vertex_id):
        # Return the vertex object (here just the id)
        self._vertices.setdefault(vertex_id, vertex_id)
        return vertex_id

    def get_predecessors(self, vertex_id):
        # Return the list of predecessors for the given vertex_id
        return self._predecessors.get(vertex_id, [])

# ================================
# Basic Test Cases
# ================================

def test_no_chat_inputs_returns_original():
    """No ChatInput in any layer: should return the original layers unchanged."""
    layers = [["A", "B"], ["C", "D"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.25μs -> 1.42μs (11.8% slower)

def test_single_chat_input_no_dependencies():
    """Single ChatInput, no dependencies: should move to first layer."""
    layers = [["A", "ChatInput1"], ["B", "C"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A"], ["B", "C"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.33μs -> 2.08μs (12.0% faster)

def test_multiple_chat_inputs_no_dependencies():
    """Multiple ChatInputs, no dependencies: all should move to first layer."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["ChatInput2", "B"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2"], ["A"], ["B"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.62μs -> 2.38μs (10.5% faster)

def test_chat_input_with_dependency():
    """ChatInput with a dependency: should NOT move any ChatInput."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    # ChatInput1 has a predecessor, so should not be moved
    dummy = DummySelf(predecessors={"ChatInput1": ["X"]})
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.04μs -> 1.08μs (3.88% slower)

def test_mixed_chat_inputs_some_with_dependencies():
    """Some ChatInputs have dependencies, some don't: should NOT move any if any ChatInput has dependency."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["ChatInput2", "B"]]
    # ChatInput2 has a dependency, so none should be moved
    dummy = DummySelf(predecessors={"ChatInput2": ["Y"]})
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.50μs -> 2.00μs (25.0% slower)

def test_chat_input_in_later_layer():
    """ChatInput appears in a non-first layer, no dependencies: should be moved to first."""
    layers = [["A", "B"], ["ChatInput1", "C"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A", "B"], ["C"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.96μs -> 1.96μs (0.051% slower)

def test_empty_layers():
    """Empty layers should be handled gracefully."""
    layers = [[], ["ChatInput1"], []]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], [], []]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.21μs -> 2.04μs (8.13% faster)

# ================================
# Edge Test Cases
# ================================

def test_empty_input():
    """Empty input (no layers) should return empty list."""
    layers = []
    dummy = DummySelf()
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, []); result = codeflash_output # 417ns -> 542ns (23.1% slower)

def test_layers_with_only_chat_inputs():
    """All layers only have ChatInputs: should flatten all ChatInputs to first layer."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1"], ["ChatInput2"], ["ChatInput3"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2", "ChatInput3"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 3.00μs -> 2.75μs (9.09% faster)

def test_layers_with_duplicate_chat_inputs():
    """Duplicate ChatInputs across layers: should collect all in first layer (duplicates preserved)."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["ChatInput1", "B"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput1"], ["A"], ["B"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.42μs -> 2.29μs (5.45% faster)


def test_chat_input_with_empty_string_id():
    """ChatInput with empty string id: should not be moved."""
    layers = [["", "A"], ["ChatInput1"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["", "A"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.04μs -> 2.12μs (3.91% slower)

def test_chat_input_substring_in_id():
    """Vertex id contains 'ChatInput' as a substring: should be moved."""
    layers = [["fooChatInputBar", "A"], ["B"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["fooChatInputBar"], ["A"], ["B"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.17μs -> 2.04μs (6.12% faster)

def test_chat_input_with_self_dependency():
    """ChatInput with itself as predecessor: should NOT be moved."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    dummy = DummySelf(predecessors={"ChatInput1": ["ChatInput1"]})
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.00μs -> 1.04μs (4.03% slower)

def test_chat_input_with_multiple_dependencies():
    """ChatInput with multiple predecessors: should NOT be moved."""
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    dummy = DummySelf(predecessors={"ChatInput1": ["X", "Y"]})
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 958ns -> 1.08μs (11.6% slower)

def test_layers_with_empty_lists_and_chat_inputs():
    """Some layers empty, some with ChatInputs: should move ChatInputs to first layer, keep empty layers."""
    layers = [[], ["ChatInput1"], [], ["A", "ChatInput2"]]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2"], [], [], ["A"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 3.00μs -> 2.79μs (7.49% faster)

# ================================
# Large Scale Test Cases
# ================================

def test_large_number_of_layers_and_chat_inputs():
    """Test with 100 layers, each with a ChatInput and another node, no dependencies."""
    n = 100
    layers = [[f"ChatInput{i}", f"Node{i}"] for i in range(n)]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [[f"ChatInput{i}" for i in range(n)]] + [[f"Node{i}"] for i in range(n)]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 47.5μs -> 41.5μs (14.3% faster)

def test_large_number_of_layers_no_chat_inputs():
    """Test with 100 layers, no ChatInputs at all."""
    n = 100
    layers = [[f"Node{i}", f"Node{i+1}"] for i in range(n)]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 16.5μs -> 17.5μs (5.49% slower)

def test_large_number_of_layers_some_chat_inputs_with_dependencies():
    """Test with 100 layers, half ChatInputs have dependencies, none should move."""
    n = 100
    layers = []
    predecessors = {}
    for i in range(n):
        if i % 2 == 0:
            layers.append([f"ChatInput{i}", f"Node{i}"])
            predecessors[f"ChatInput{i}"] = ["X"]
        else:
            layers.append([f"ChatInput{i}", f"Node{i}"])
    dummy = DummySelf(predecessors=predecessors)
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.17μs -> 1.25μs (6.64% slower)

def test_large_number_of_layers_all_chat_inputs_no_dependencies():
    """Test with 1000 ChatInputs, all in separate layers, no dependencies."""
    n = 1000
    layers = [[f"ChatInput{i}"] for i in range(n)]
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [[f"ChatInput{i}" for i in range(n)]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 377μs -> 319μs (18.1% faster)

def test_large_layers_with_mixed_nodes():
    """Test with 10 layers, each with 100 nodes, some ChatInputs scattered, no dependencies."""
    n_layers = 10
    n_per_layer = 100
    layers = []
    chat_inputs = []
    for i in range(n_layers):
        layer = [f"Node{n_per_layer*i + j}" for j in range(n_per_layer)]
        # Add a ChatInput at the start of every even layer
        if i % 2 == 0:
            chat_id = f"ChatInput{i}"
            layer.insert(0, chat_id)
            chat_inputs.append(chat_id)
        layers.append(layer)
    dummy = DummySelf()
    expected = [chat_inputs] + [
        [v for v in layer if "ChatInput" not in v] for layer in layers
    ]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(dummy, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 28.1μs -> 30.5μs (7.92% slower)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

from typing import List

# imports
import pytest
from src.dsa.nodes import sort_chat_inputs_first


# Helper class to mock the required methods and state for testing
class MockGraph:
    def __init__(self, predecessors: dict, vertices: dict = None):
        # predecessors: dict mapping vertex_id to list of predecessor ids
        self._predecessors = predecessors
        self._vertices = vertices or {}

    def get_vertex(self, vertex_id):
        # For this mock, just return the vertex_id itself
        return vertex_id

    def get_predecessors(self, vertex_id):
        # Return the list of predecessors for this vertex_id
        return self._predecessors.get(vertex_id, [])

# ---------------------------
# Basic Test Cases
# ---------------------------

def test_no_chat_inputs():
    # No ChatInput nodes at all
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={})
    layers = [["A", "B"], ["C"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.08μs -> 1.33μs (18.8% slower)

def test_single_chat_input_no_dependencies():
    # Single ChatInput, no dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": []})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A"], ["B"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.96μs -> 1.83μs (6.82% faster)

def test_multiple_chat_inputs_no_dependencies():
    # Multiple ChatInputs, none with dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": [], "ChatInput2": []})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["ChatInput2", "B"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2"], ["A"], ["B"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.21μs -> 2.04μs (8.13% faster)

def test_chat_input_with_dependency():
    # ChatInput node with dependencies; should not move any ChatInput
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": ["X"]})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    input_layers = [layer.copy() for layer in layers]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, input_layers); result = codeflash_output # 833ns -> 958ns (13.0% slower)

def test_mixed_chat_inputs_some_with_dependencies():
    # Some ChatInputs with dependencies, some without; should not move any
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": [], "ChatInput2": ["A"]})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["ChatInput2", "B"]]
    input_layers = [layer.copy() for layer in layers]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, input_layers); result = codeflash_output # 1.12μs -> 1.79μs (37.2% slower)

def test_chat_input_not_first_layer():
    # ChatInput node not in the first layer, no dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": []})
    layers = [["A"], ["ChatInput1", "B"], ["C"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A"], ["B"], ["C"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.00μs -> 2.04μs (2.06% slower)

def test_chat_input_already_first_layer():
    # ChatInput already in the first layer, no dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": []})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A"], ["B"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.75μs -> 1.75μs (0.000% faster)

def test_multiple_layers_multiple_chat_inputs():
    # Multiple ChatInputs in different layers, no dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": [], "ChatInput2": [], "ChatInput3": []})
    layers = [["A"], ["ChatInput1", "B"], ["ChatInput2"], ["C", "ChatInput3"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2", "ChatInput3"], ["A"], ["B"], ["C"]]
    # Note: The ChatInputs are collected in order of appearance
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 3.04μs -> 2.88μs (5.81% faster)

# ---------------------------
# Edge Test Cases
# ---------------------------

def test_empty_layers():
    # No layers at all
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={})
    layers = []
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, []); result = codeflash_output # 417ns -> 542ns (23.1% slower)

def test_layers_with_empty_lists():
    # Layers are empty lists, no ChatInputs
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={})
    layers = [[], [], []]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.12μs -> 1.29μs (12.9% slower)

def test_layers_with_only_chat_inputs():
    # All layers only have ChatInputs, no dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": [], "ChatInput2": []})
    layers = [["ChatInput1"], ["ChatInput2"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.04μs -> 2.00μs (2.10% faster)

def test_duplicate_chat_input_names():
    # Duplicate ChatInput names in different layers, no dependencies
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": [], "ChatInput2": []})
    layers = [["ChatInput1"], ["ChatInput1", "ChatInput2"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1", "ChatInput1", "ChatInput2"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.58μs -> 2.38μs (8.76% faster)


def test_chat_input_with_empty_dependency_list():
    # ChatInput with empty dependency list (should be moved)
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": []})
    layers = [["A"], ["ChatInput1"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 1.83μs -> 1.88μs (2.24% slower)

def test_chat_input_with_none_dependency():
    # ChatInput with None as dependencies (should treat as no dependencies)
    class MockGraphWithNone(MockGraph):
        def get_predecessors(self, vertex_id):
            val = self._predecessors.get(vertex_id, [])
            return [] if val is None else val
    graph = MockGraphWithNone(predecessors={"ChatInput1": None})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"]]
    expected = [["ChatInput1"], ["A"]]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.12μs -> 2.00μs (6.25% faster)

def test_layers_are_mutated():
    # Ensure input layers are not mutated by the function
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={"ChatInput1": []})
    layers = [["ChatInput1", "A"], ["B"]]
    layers_copy = [layer.copy() for layer in layers]
    sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, layers_copy)

# ---------------------------
# Large Scale Test Cases
# ---------------------------

def test_large_number_of_layers_and_vertices():
    # Many layers, each with many vertices, some ChatInputs
    num_layers = 50
    num_vertices_per_layer = 10
    chat_inputs = [f"ChatInput{i}" for i in range(10)]
    # Place one ChatInput in each of the first 10 layers
    layers = []
    for i in range(num_layers):
        layer = [f"V{i}_{j}" for j in range(num_vertices_per_layer)]
        if i < len(chat_inputs):
            layer.append(chat_inputs[i])
        layers.append(layer)
    # All ChatInputs have no dependencies
    predecessors = {cid: [] for cid in chat_inputs}
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors=predecessors)
    expected_first_layer = chat_inputs.copy()
    # Remove ChatInputs from original layers for expected output
    expected_layers = []
    for i, layer in enumerate(layers):
        expected_layer = [v for v in layer if v not in chat_inputs]
        if expected_layer:
            expected_layers.append(expected_layer)
    expected = [expected_first_layer] + expected_layers
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 24.3μs -> 21.6μs (12.5% faster)

def test_large_number_of_chat_inputs_with_dependencies():
    # Many ChatInputs, at least one with dependencies
    num_chat_inputs = 20
    chat_inputs = [f"ChatInput{i}" for i in range(num_chat_inputs)]
    layers = [[cid] for cid in chat_inputs]
    # Set one ChatInput to have dependencies
    predecessors = {cid: [] for cid in chat_inputs}
    predecessors["ChatInput10"] = ["A"]
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors=predecessors)
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 2.75μs -> 4.79μs (42.6% slower)

def test_large_layers_no_chat_inputs():
    # Large number of layers and vertices, no ChatInputs
    num_layers = 100
    num_vertices_per_layer = 8
    layers = [[f"V{i}_{j}" for j in range(num_vertices_per_layer)] for i in range(num_layers)]
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors={})
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 29.5μs -> 31.2μs (5.60% slower)

def test_large_layers_all_chat_inputs():
    # All vertices are ChatInputs, none with dependencies
    num_layers = 10
    num_chat_inputs_per_layer = 10
    chat_inputs = [f"ChatInput{i}_{j}" for i in range(num_layers) for j in range(num_chat_inputs_per_layer)]
    layers = []
    idx = 0
    for i in range(num_layers):
        layer = []
        for j in range(num_chat_inputs_per_layer):
            layer.append(chat_inputs[idx])
            idx += 1
        layers.append(layer)
    predecessors = {cid: [] for cid in chat_inputs}
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors=predecessors)
    expected = [chat_inputs]
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 25.5μs -> 19.5μs (31.0% faster)

def test_performance_with_maximum_elements():
    # Stress test with close to 1000 elements
    num_layers = 20
    num_vertices_per_layer = 50
    chat_inputs = [f"ChatInput{i}" for i in range(20)]
    layers = []
    for i in range(num_layers):
        layer = [f"V{i}_{j}" for j in range(num_vertices_per_layer)]
        if i < len(chat_inputs):
            layer.append(chat_inputs[i])
        layers.append(layer)
    predecessors = {cid: [] for cid in chat_inputs}
    graph = MockGraph(predecessors=predecessors)
    expected_first_layer = chat_inputs.copy()
    expected_layers = []
    for i, layer in enumerate(layers):
        expected_layer = [v for v in layer if v not in chat_inputs]
        if expected_layer:
            expected_layers.append(expected_layer)
    expected = [expected_first_layer] + expected_layers
    codeflash_output = sort_chat_inputs_first(graph, [layer.copy() for layer in layers]); result = codeflash_output # 41.4μs -> 32.1μs (29.1% faster)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-sort_chat_inputs_first-mc8popkq and push.

Codeflash

Here is a high-performance rewrite of your function incorporating recommendations from the profiler and making the core logic as efficient as possible.

### Bottleneck Analysis

From your profiler.
- The main hotspots are.
  - `"ChatInput" in vertex_id` (done repeatedly per vertex, often for the same vertex twice)
  - `self.get_vertex(vertex_id)` and then `self.get_predecessors(...)` (done for every "ChatInput" in every layer, re-traversing graph data that may not have changed)
  - `layer.remove(vertex_id)` (removes items from lists during iteration, which is O(n) and risks skipping elements or doing slow searches)
- Two traversals are needed: first for dependency check, second for restructuring. Can these be merged? Yes.

### Key Optimizations

1. **One-pass collection:** Do a single pass through all vertices, collecting "chat input" vertices and whether they have dependencies, remove them efficiently, and build new layers.
2. **Avoid `list.remove` inside loop:** Build new layers without "ChatInput" vertices rather than deleting-in-place, avoiding unnecessary list traversals.
3. **Reduce repeated checks:** Only call get_vertex/get_predecessors for those IDs that pass the substring check (fast path).
4. **Short-circuit quickly:** Immediately return if any ChatInput has dependencies.
5. **Minimize allocations:** Reuse objects and preallocate where possible.

### Rewritten Code



### Optimization Summary

- **Single pass.** Only one traversal over the data, both for dependency checking and collecting.
- **No in-place removal.** Instead of `layer.remove`, build new lists.
- **Minimal checks.** Only evaluate slow graph methods immediately before a possible short-circuit.
- **No double iteration on "ChatInput" vertices** per the original implementation; each is touched once.

### Compatibility

- There are no installed libraries, so the above requires only core Python features.
- No changes to function signature or semantics — only the implementation is altered for much better runtime and memory behavior.

Let me know if you want a further-parallelized or NumPy-based approach, but in this data-shape (lists of IDs, graph methods), this is likely optimal.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Jun 23, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from KRRT7 June 23, 2025 06:24
@KRRT7 KRRT7 closed this Jun 23, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-sort_chat_inputs_first-mc8popkq branch June 23, 2025 23:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant