Skip to content

[pull] main from tldraw:main#575

Merged
pull[bot] merged 1 commit into
code:mainfrom
tldraw:main
Jun 6, 2026
Merged

[pull] main from tldraw:main#575
pull[bot] merged 1 commit into
code:mainfrom
tldraw:main

Conversation

@pull
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pull pull Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

In order to make `/issue` useful for quick, low-context reports without
sending downstream agents past missing intent, this PR creates issues
immediately and then matures them through a confidence-scored follow-up
flow.

The old flow front-loaded codebase research before creating the issue.
The new flow inverts that: create the issue from the user's initial
description, read back the problem in product terms, score how complete
the captured intent is, and ask the questions that would fill the gaps —
updating the issue in place as answers arrive.

### What changes

- **Create first, mature later.** The skill creates the issue right away
so the user can track it, rather than researching the codebase to death
first.
- **Standard body shape.** The body starts with the user's verbatim
description, then a short product-facing **readback** of the problem, a
numbered list of **Open questions**, and a plain-text **Confidence**
status line (e.g. `Confidence: 84%, ready to get started.`).
- **Light investigation.** Codebase searching is kept to just enough to
ground the confidence score and ask sharp questions. Anything answerable
from the code should not become an open question, and implementation
breadcrumbs (file paths, function names, fix recipes) stay out of the
body unless the user asks for them.
- **Q&A loop.** As the user answers, the issue is updated via `gh issue
edit`: answers are written beneath each question, the readback is
revised, the confidence line is recomputed, and the issue framing
(title, type, labels) can be adjusted if an answer changes what the
issue is.
- **Critical vs. deferred questions.** Questions prefixed `Critical:`
block readiness and cannot be skipped. Non-critical questions the user
chooses not to answer are marked `_Deferred by user; not blocking
implementation._` and do not block.
- **Downstream guardrails.** The `take` skill now treats unresolved
`Critical:` questions, `_Awaiting answer._` placeholders, and the `More
Info Needed` label as blockers before implementation.
- **Issue type helper.** `skills/issue/scripts/set-issue-type.sh` sets
GitHub issue types via GraphQL because `gh issue create --type` is
unreliable across versions.

### Change type

- [x] `other`

### Test plan

1. Read the `/issue` workflow and confirm follow-up answers retrigger
the skill and update the issue body in place.
2. Read the `write-issue` standards and confirm the readback, open
questions, and deferred-question conventions are documented.
3. Read the `take` workflow and confirm unresolved agent-drafted
questions block implementation.
4. Run `git diff --check`.

### Code changes

| Section        | LOC change |
| -------------- | ---------- |
| Config/tooling | +110 / -23 |
@pull pull Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2026
@pull pull Bot added the ⤵️ pull label Jun 6, 2026
@pull pull Bot merged commit fb2bc78 into code:main Jun 6, 2026
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to bemo-canary June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to npm deploy June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to bemo-canary June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to deploy-staging June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to vsce publish June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to deploy-production June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot requested a deployment to deploy-staging June 6, 2026 21:13 Queued
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to npm deploy June 6, 2026 21:13 Failure
@pull pull Bot had a problem deploying to deploy-staging June 7, 2026 00:58 Failure
@pull pull Bot deployed to e2e-dotcom June 7, 2026 02:38 Active
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant