Skip to content

Conversation

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Jul 30, 2025

https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/july-2025-security-releases

closes #273

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated CI workflow to test only on supported Node.js versions (16, 18, 20, 22, 24).
    • Removed outdated scripts and development dependencies from project configuration.
    • Improved and simplified test and CI scripts.
    • Updated security patch ranges for Node.js versions in configuration.
  • Style

    • Refined import statements in test files for consistency and clarity.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 requested review from Copilot and elrrrrrrr July 30, 2025 22:34
@fengmk2 fengmk2 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 30, 2025 22:34
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the Node.js CI workflow by removing version 14 from testing, revise the package.json scripts and devDependencies, update unsafe Node.js version ranges in the configuration, and modernize test imports in the test file. No logic or test assertions were altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CI Workflow Node.js Versions
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml
Removed Node.js 14 from CI test matrix; tests now run on Node.js 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 only.
Package Scripts & DevDependencies
package.json
Removed contributor script and related devDependencies (git-contributor, c8, test). Updated test script to correct syntax, added preci script for linting, and simplified ci script to run only tests. Updated config.unsafe-node-versions ranges and patch versions for Node.js 20, 22, and 24, with new security release URLs.
Test Imports Modernization
test/index.test.js
Changed imports to use explicit Node.js core module specifiers (node:assert, node:test) and updated package metadata import to package.json file directly. No changes to test logic or assertions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CI Workflow
    participant Node.js Matrix

    Developer->>CI Workflow: Push code / PR
    CI Workflow->>Node.js Matrix: Run tests on Node.js 16, 18, 20, 22, 24
    Node.js Matrix-->>CI Workflow: Report test results
    CI Workflow-->>Developer: CI status (Node.js 14 excluded)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update unsafe Node.js version ranges and patch versions in response to July 2025 security releases (#273)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement

Poem

A hop, a skip, a patch or two,
Node.js is safer—thanks to you!
Old version gone, new scripts in place,
Our tests now run at a brisker pace.
With every change, this bunny cheers,
For code that’s safe for future years! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch july-2025-security-releases

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates Node.js bug version tracking to reflect the July 2025 security releases, removing vulnerable versions and updating dependency configurations.

  • Updates Node.js bug version entries for v20, v22, and v24 with new security patch versions
  • Removes deprecated dependencies and test coverage tools
  • Modernizes test imports to use Node.js built-in modules

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
package.json Updates Node.js bug version tracking with July 2025 security releases and removes deprecated dependencies
test/index.test.js Modernizes imports to use Node.js built-in modules and corrects package.json import
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml Removes Node.js 14 from CI test matrix
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)

package.json:24

  • Husky v4.2.5 is quite outdated and may have compatibility issues with newer Node.js versions. Consider updating to a more recent version (v8+ is current) or verify this version is intentionally pinned for compatibility reasons.
    "husky": "^4.2.5"

package.json:94

  • Node.js version 24.4.1 appears to be a future release that may not exist yet. Please verify this version number against the actual July 2025 security releases announcement.
      ">= 24.0.0 < 24.4.1": {

package.json:78

  • Node.js version 20.19.4 may not exist yet. Please verify this version number against the actual July 2025 security releases, as Node.js 20.x typically has lower patch numbers.
      ">= 20.0.0 < 20.19.4": {

package.json:86

  • Node.js version 22.17.1 appears to be a future release. Please verify this version number exists in the actual July 2025 security releases.
      ">= 22.0.0 < 22.17.1": {

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @fengmk2, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on integrating the latest Node.js 2025-07-15 security releases by updating the project's package.json to reflect the new safe version ranges for Node.js 20.x, 22.x, and 24.x. Concurrently, it includes general maintenance to the project's build and test infrastructure, modernizing script definitions and module imports for better alignment with current Node.js best practices.

Highlights

  • Node.js Security Updates: Updated the unsafe-node-versions ranges within package.json to reflect the Node.js 2025-07-15 security releases. This includes updating the vulnerable version ranges for Node.js 20.x (to < 20.19.4), 22.x (to < 22.17.1), and 24.x (to < 24.4.1), ensuring the project tracks the latest patched versions.
  • Script and Dependency Refactoring: Streamlined package.json scripts by correcting a typo in the test command (node--test to node --test), introducing a preci hook for linting, simplifying the ci command, and removing unused development dependencies (c8, git-contributor, and the generic test package).
  • Modern Node.js Imports: Updated test/index.test.js to align with modern Node.js practices by using the node: protocol prefix for built-in modules (node:assert, node:test) and explicitly referencing package.json when requiring it.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the insecure Node.js versions and modernizes the test scripts. The removal of code coverage reporting and some dependencies warrants a check to ensure no functionality is lost.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

10-13: preci hook works but is easy to miss

npm run ci will automatically call the preci script (because of npm-script lifecycle naming), so the lint step still runs.
If this was meant to be explicit rather than implicit, consider folding the lint directly back into the ci script to avoid the “magic” and make the pipeline intention obvious.

-  "ci": "npm test",
+  "ci": "npm run lint && npm test",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f0827a and c4af644.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • test/index.test.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
package.json (1)

10-13: Watch out for node --test on Node 16

The built-in test runner is unflagged only from Node 18 upwards.
On Node 16 it exists but is still experimental and only from v16.17+.
CI currently targets 16 (Line 16 in the workflow) without pinning to ≥16.17, so an older patch image could break the build.

Two options:

-      version: '16, 18, 20, 22, 24'
+      # pin to the first 16.x that shipped the test runner
+      version: '16.17, 18, 20, 22, 24'

or drop 16 completely now that LTS ends in Sep 2025.
Up to you, but please lock this down to prevent flaky CI.

.github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1)

16-16: String list parsing – make sure the action likes it

The composite action expects a comma-separated list, but wrapping everything in a single quoted string means the step receives one item ("16, 18, 20, 22, 24").
Check the action’s implementation; many expect a literal newline-separated list or an array input.

If it needs an array, use YAML arrays:

version: |
  16
  18
  20
  22
  24

Otherwise CI will only test against the first entry after it splits.

test/index.test.js (2)

1-2: Good move to explicit node: imports

Using the node: prefix avoids module-resolution surprises and is forward-compatible.
Looks clean.


5-5: Explicit JSON import avoids “main” resolution side-effects

Requiring package.json directly is clearer than relying on package export resolution.
LGTM.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 3d0069e into master Jul 31, 2025
9 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the july-2025-security-releases branch July 31, 2025 02:08
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
[skip ci]

## [1.115.0](v1.114.0...v1.115.0) (2025-07-31)

### Features

* node.js 2025-07-15 security releases ([#274](#274)) ([3d0069e](3d0069e))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Node.js Tuesday, July 15, 2025 Security Releases

3 participants