-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
feat: node.js 2025-07-15 security releases #274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the Node.js CI workflow by removing version 14 from testing, revise the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant CI Workflow
participant Node.js Matrix
Developer->>CI Workflow: Push code / PR
CI Workflow->>Node.js Matrix: Run tests on Node.js 16, 18, 20, 22, 24
Node.js Matrix-->>CI Workflow: Report test results
CI Workflow-->>Developer: CI status (Node.js 14 excluded)
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates Node.js bug version tracking to reflect the July 2025 security releases, removing vulnerable versions and updating dependency configurations.
- Updates Node.js bug version entries for v20, v22, and v24 with new security patch versions
- Removes deprecated dependencies and test coverage tools
- Modernizes test imports to use Node.js built-in modules
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| package.json | Updates Node.js bug version tracking with July 2025 security releases and removes deprecated dependencies |
| test/index.test.js | Modernizes imports to use Node.js built-in modules and corrects package.json import |
| .github/workflows/nodejs.yml | Removes Node.js 14 from CI test matrix |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)
package.json:24
- Husky v4.2.5 is quite outdated and may have compatibility issues with newer Node.js versions. Consider updating to a more recent version (v8+ is current) or verify this version is intentionally pinned for compatibility reasons.
"husky": "^4.2.5"
package.json:94
- Node.js version 24.4.1 appears to be a future release that may not exist yet. Please verify this version number against the actual July 2025 security releases announcement.
">= 24.0.0 < 24.4.1": {
package.json:78
- Node.js version 20.19.4 may not exist yet. Please verify this version number against the actual July 2025 security releases, as Node.js 20.x typically has lower patch numbers.
">= 20.0.0 < 20.19.4": {
package.json:86
- Node.js version 22.17.1 appears to be a future release. Please verify this version number exists in the actual July 2025 security releases.
">= 22.0.0 < 22.17.1": {
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fengmk2, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on integrating the latest Node.js 2025-07-15 security releases by updating the project's package.json to reflect the new safe version ranges for Node.js 20.x, 22.x, and 24.x. Concurrently, it includes general maintenance to the project's build and test infrastructure, modernizing script definitions and module imports for better alignment with current Node.js best practices.
Highlights
- Node.js Security Updates: Updated the
unsafe-node-versionsranges withinpackage.jsonto reflect the Node.js 2025-07-15 security releases. This includes updating the vulnerable version ranges for Node.js 20.x (to< 20.19.4), 22.x (to< 22.17.1), and 24.x (to< 24.4.1), ensuring the project tracks the latest patched versions. - Script and Dependency Refactoring: Streamlined
package.jsonscripts by correcting a typo in thetestcommand (node--testtonode --test), introducing aprecihook for linting, simplifying thecicommand, and removing unused development dependencies (c8,git-contributor, and the generictestpackage). - Modern Node.js Imports: Updated
test/index.test.jsto align with modern Node.js practices by using thenode:protocol prefix for built-in modules (node:assert,node:test) and explicitly referencingpackage.jsonwhen requiring it.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the insecure Node.js versions and modernizes the test scripts. The removal of code coverage reporting and some dependencies warrants a check to ensure no functionality is lost.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
10-13:precihook works but is easy to miss
npm run ciwill automatically call thepreciscript (because of npm-script lifecycle naming), so the lint step still runs.
If this was meant to be explicit rather than implicit, consider folding the lint directly back into theciscript to avoid the “magic” and make the pipeline intention obvious.- "ci": "npm test", + "ci": "npm run lint && npm test",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)test/index.test.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
package.json (1)
10-13: Watch out fornode --teston Node 16The built-in test runner is unflagged only from Node 18 upwards.
On Node 16 it exists but is still experimental and only from v16.17+.
CI currently targets16(Line 16 in the workflow) without pinning to ≥16.17, so an older patch image could break the build.Two options:
- version: '16, 18, 20, 22, 24' + # pin to the first 16.x that shipped the test runner + version: '16.17, 18, 20, 22, 24'or drop 16 completely now that LTS ends in Sep 2025.
Up to you, but please lock this down to prevent flaky CI..github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1)
16-16: String list parsing – make sure the action likes itThe composite action expects a comma-separated list, but wrapping everything in a single quoted string means the step receives one item (
"16, 18, 20, 22, 24").
Check the action’s implementation; many expect a literal newline-separated list or an array input.If it needs an array, use YAML arrays:
version: | 16 18 20 22 24Otherwise CI will only test against the first entry after it splits.
test/index.test.js (2)
1-2: Good move to explicitnode:importsUsing the
node:prefix avoids module-resolution surprises and is forward-compatible.
Looks clean.
5-5: Explicit JSON import avoids “main” resolution side-effectsRequiring
package.jsondirectly is clearer than relying onpackageexport resolution.
LGTM.
[skip ci] ## [1.115.0](v1.114.0...v1.115.0) (2025-07-31) ### Features * node.js 2025-07-15 security releases ([#274](#274)) ([3d0069e](3d0069e))
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/july-2025-security-releases
closes #273
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Style