add a check if wakealarm is supported (bugfix)

[aglinserer]

Description

This avoids a failing test and skips it instead if the rtc does not support an automatic wakeup.
The suspend_advanced_auto job is failing even though it cannot be run when the wakealarm is not supported.

Resolved issues

N/A

Documentation

N/A

Tests

N/A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.22%. Comparing base (dc0c59e) to head (fd11931).
⚠️ Report is 111 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1921      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   50.47%   50.22%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         382      382              
  Lines       41055    40809     -246     
  Branches     6895     6847      -48     
==========================================
- Hits        20722    20496     -226     
+ Misses      19587    19579       -8     
+ Partials      746      734      -12     

Flag	Coverage Δ
provider-base	25.66% <ø> (-1.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[pieqq]

Thanks for your contribution!

I left a comment inline.

Can you describe the use case you have and the issue you're encountering? This job is very sensitive because it's used in almost every test plan we maintain, so modifying it is always a bit risky.

[aglinserer]

Can you describe the use case you have and the issue you're encountering? This job is very sensitive because it's used in almost every test plan we maintain, so modifying it is always a bit risky.

Currently, I am running Checkbox on hardware that does not support the wakealarm functionality. My thought is that if the interface or functionality is not supported, failing this test - based solely on rtc.state == supported and mem.sleep == supported - is incorrect. I would assume that checking for wakealarm functionality should be a requirement for this since it depends on this.

After giving it some more thought you could also interpret suspendability as a basic requirement. Then failing this would be the correct choice. This thought only occured after creating this pull request :)

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in a week.

[github-actions]

This PR was closed because of inactivity. Feel free to re-open this once you want to work on it again!