Skip to content

Conversation

@mike-w-wilson
Copy link
Contributor

This was never put in the common code. I could not find a reason but I think it just slipped through the cracks. The field is considered a sparse entry field but it sticks around after densify. Our subset code exports it so we should have it stored in this repo. If someone chooses to omit it, they can just drop it from the dictionary.

@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson self-assigned this Aug 4, 2025
@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2025 19:06
@ch-kr ch-kr self-assigned this Aug 5, 2025
@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson requested a review from ch-kr August 5, 2025 17:56
@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson merged commit 95b42cb into main Aug 5, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants