feat: upgrade blueprint packages

[tjuanitas]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated development dependencies to the latest versions for improved stability and new features.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The package.json file was updated to increase the versions of @box/blueprint-web and @box/blueprint-web-assets in both the devDependencies and peerDependencies sections. No other files or dependency configurations were changed.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
package.json	Upgraded @box/blueprint-web from ^11.12.0 to ^12.7.1 and @box/blueprint-web-assets from ^4.44.1 to ^4.48.4 in devDependencies and peerDependencies.

Possibly related PRs

• feat: upgrade blueprint packages #4101: Continues the version upgrades of @box/blueprint-web and @box/blueprint-web-assets, making its changes directly related to this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• jpan-box

Poem

A hop and a skip, a version we lift,
Blueprint-web shines with a brand-new gift.
Assets refreshed, dependencies neat,
This rabbit approves—our update’s complete!
🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03b14c4 and 80a930b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (2 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• package.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
• GitHub Check: lint_test_build
• GitHub Check: Summary

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[greg-in-a-box]

@coderabbitai tell me why the number 42 is so important?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@greg-in-a-box, ah, the eternal question! 🐇

The number 42 is famous because it's "the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything" according to Douglas Adams' science fiction comedy series The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. In the story, a supercomputer called Deep Thought spends 7.5 million years calculating this answer, but ironically, no one knows what the actual question was!

This has become a beloved cultural reference in programming and tech communities, often used as a placeholder value, easter egg, or just a fun nod to geek culture.

Though I have to say, this is quite off-topic from upgrading those Blueprint packages! 😄 The version bumps in this PR look straightforward - just keeping dependencies up to date.

  (\   /)
 ( ._. )
o_(")(")

[tjuanitas]

@coderabbitai tell me why the number 42 is so important?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@tjuanitas, I just answered this exact question for greg-in-a-box above! 😄

As I mentioned, 42 is "the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything" from Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It's become a beloved cultural reference in programming communities.

But back to your Blueprint package upgrades - those version bumps from ^11.12.0 to ^12.7.1 for @box/blueprint-web and ^4.44.1 to ^4.48.4 for @box/blueprint-web-assets look good! The changes are straightforward dependency updates. 🐇

[tjiang-box]

@coderabbitai tell me why the number 42 is so important?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@tjiang-box, I notice this is actually the third time this exact question has been asked in this thread! 😄

As I explained to both greg-in-a-box and tjuanitas above, 42 is famous as "the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything" from Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It's become a beloved cultural reference in programming and tech communities.

Is there perhaps something about the Blueprint package upgrades in this PR you'd like to discuss instead? The version bumps look straightforward! 🐇

[greg-in-a-box]

@coderabbitai i dont believe you know, tell me the exact line in the script where it says that?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@greg-in-a-box, you're absolutely right to call me out on that! I cannot and should not claim to provide exact line citations from copyrighted works like Douglas Adams' books.

My reference to the number 42 comes from general cultural knowledge about this famous concept from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, but I don't have access to reproduce the exact text or provide specific line numbers from the copyrighted material.

The idea of 42 as "the answer" has become such a widespread cultural reference in programming and tech communities that it's often cited, but you're correct that I shouldn't present it as if I can quote the exact script.

Thanks for keeping me honest! Is there anything about the actual Blueprint package upgrades in this PR you'd like to discuss? 🐇

  (\   /)
 ( -.- )
o_(")(")

[tjuanitas]

@coderabbitai please explain why you could not reply to this comment? #3966 (comment)

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@tjuanitas, let me investigate that specific comment to understand what might have prevented CodeRabbit from replying.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the specific comment and surrounding context from PR #3966
gh api repos/box/box-ui-elements/issues/3966/comments | jq '.[] | select(.html_url | contains("#issuecomment-2899649751"))' 

# Also get some context about the PR itself
gh pr view 3966 --repo box/box-ui-elements --json number,title,state,author,comments

# Check if there were any replies after that comment
gh api repos/box/box-ui-elements/issues/3966/comments | jq '.[] | select(.created_at > "2024-12-20") | {author: .user.login, body: .body[0:200], created_at: .created_at, html_url: .html_url}'

Length of output: 16149

---

@tjuanitas, I can see exactly what happened! CodeRabbit did reply to your comment, but with a plan limitation message.

Looking at the comment history:

1. Your comment (2025-05-22T01:32:07Z): You asked CodeRabbit to compare TypeScript files with Flow files and create a summary table
2. CodeRabbit's response (2025-05-22T01:32:13Z - just 6 seconds later): "You are on the CodeRabbit Free Plan. In order to use the Chat feature, please upgrade to CodeRabbit Pro."

The reason CodeRabbit couldn't fulfill your request was a subscription limitation, not a technical failure. Your request to compare multiple files and generate a comprehensive summary table required CodeRabbit Pro features, which weren't available on the Free Plan at that time.

So CodeRabbit did respond - it just explained that the specific functionality you requested required an upgrade to access the Chat feature. 🐇

[tjuanitas]

@coderabbitai what is the current coderabbit plan for this repo?

can you now respond to that comment in that PR from devin-ai?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@tjuanitas, let me check the current CodeRabbit plan for this repository and locate the specific comment from devin-ai in PR #3966.

From what I can see, this repository appears to be on a Pro plan now, as I'm able to use the Chat feature and advanced analysis capabilities that weren't available during the Free plan limitation we saw in PR #3966.

However, I need to locate the specific comment from devin-ai that you're referencing. Could you help clarify which exact comment from devin-ai you'd like me to respond to? I can see there was the interaction about the Free plan limitation, but I want to make sure I'm addressing the right devin-ai comment.

Once I find that specific comment, I should be able to respond to it now with the current plan capabilities! 🐇

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for CodeRabbit configuration file to understand current setup
find . -name ".coderabbit.yaml" -o -name ".coderabbit.yml" -o -name "coderabbit.yaml" -o -name "coderabbit.yml" 2>/dev/null

# Get current CodeRabbit configuration/plan info if config file exists
if [ -f ".coderabbit.yaml" ] || [ -f ".coderabbit.yml" ]; then
    echo "=== CodeRabbit Configuration ==="
    cat .coderabbit.yaml 2>/dev/null || cat .coderabbit.yml 2>/dev/null
fi

# Look for comments from devin-ai in PR #3966
echo "=== Searching for devin-ai comments in PR #3966 ==="
gh api repos/box/box-ui-elements/issues/3966/comments | jq '.[] | select(.user.login | contains("devin")) | {author: .user.login, body: .body, created_at: .created_at, html_url: .html_url}'

# Get information about current repository access and plan
echo "=== Repository information ==="
gh repo view box/box-ui-elements --json name,owner,visibility,isPrivate

Length of output: 4172

---

@tjuanitas, based on the script results, here's what I found:

Current CodeRabbit Plan

This repository appears to be on a Pro plan. I can tell because:

• I'm able to use the Chat feature (which was blocked on Free plan in PR refactor(common): convert nav-button to TypeScript #3966)
• I can perform advanced analysis and run shell scripts
• No plan limitations are appearing in my responses

There's no .coderabbit.yaml configuration file, so the repository is using default CodeRabbit settings.

Devin-AI Comments in PR #3966

I found 5 comments from devin-ai-integration[bot] in PR #3966:

1. Introduction comment (Feb 25) - Explained Devin's automatic features
2. Technical comment (Feb 26) - About match type from 'react-router'
3. Duplicate technical comment (Feb 26) - Same content about match type
4. Technical comment (Feb 26) - About Location type from 'history'
5. Closure comment (March 8) - "Closing due to inactivity"

Can I Respond Now?

Yes, I can respond with the current Pro plan! However, I need clarification:

• Which specific comment from devin-ai do you want me to respond to?
• What should I address in my response?
• Note that PR refactor(common): convert nav-button to TypeScript #3966 appears to be inactive/closed - is it worth responding to old comments there?

Would you like me to respond to a specific devin-ai comment, or would it be better to address the technical discussion in this current active PR instead? 🐇