Archiving Minefield #253
Archiving Minefield #253
Conversation
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <[email protected]>
WalkthroughAdds an archived notice to README.md by updating the title and inserting a maintenance warning. No code or functionality is changed. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @nathannaveen, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the repository's main documentation to reflect its archived status. The primary purpose is to clearly communicate that the project is no longer under active development, providing transparency to anyone accessing the repository.
Highlights
- Repository Archival: The repository has been formally marked as archived and is no longer maintained.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the README.md to reflect that the project is being archived. The change effectively communicates the repository's new status with a prominent notice. I have a couple of suggestions to further refine the presentation and wording for better clarity for anyone who might visit this repository in the future.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)
1-4: Add archival date and policy to reduce support churn.Explicitly state the archive date and triage policy; add a status badge to reinforce the state.
-# BitBom Minefield (ARCHIVED) - -⚠️ **IMPORTANT: This repository is archived and no longer maintained.** +# BitBom Minefield (ARCHIVED) +[](./README.md) + +⚠️ **IMPORTANT: This repository is archived and no longer maintained (archived on August 29, 2025). No new issues or PRs will be triaged.**
1-4: Prevent mixed signals: de-emphasize badges and installation sections that imply active maintenance.
- Consider removing or relocating the Go Report Card and CI badges (Lines 9–16) under a “Historical badges” collapsible.
- Prepend “Historical only — not supported” notes before “Quickstart”, “Using Docker”, and “Building From Source”.
Example insertion right below the warning (not a diff to these lines, just a placement suggestion):
> Note: The instructions below are retained for historical reference and may no longer work due to bitrot. Images and binaries are frozen; no updates will be published.
1-4: Operational follow-ups for a clean archive.
- Disable GitHub Actions and Dependabot to stop new runs/PRs.
- Freeze/pin GHCR tags; update image description as “archived/unmaintained”.
- Lock issues/PRs or add issue templates that auto-close with an archived notice.
- Add a “Looking for alternatives?” line with links if a successor exists.
I can draft the updates (README sections, issue templates, GH Actions disable checklist). Want me to push a follow-up commit?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
- GitHub Check: docker
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Build and Scan
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
1-4: Clear archived banner — good call.The top-level title and warning are unambiguous.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary by CodeRabbit