tf 5 #23
tf 5 #23
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the logic in the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
blar-app
bot
added
size S
|
This PR introduces a new test case 'fourn_thefuck_5' and its related issue link, and refines the handling of Git push commands within the codebase. It updates the rule to match the presence of 'set-upstream' rather than the full command string, ensuring more flexible pattern matching. The test suite is cleaned up by removing an obsolete fixture related to Bitbucket outputs, and trivial file edits are made to the README to remove unnecessary trailing newlines. Overall, the changes aim to enhance test coverage and improve rule accuracy for git push command detection. Pull Request Impact: 0 🔄 File Changes Overview
📊 Impact SummaryThis tables shows the impact of the changes in the codebase
📜 Blar InstructionsBlar Commands
Tags Explanation
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
readme.md (1)
86-87: Fix markdown formatting issues.The static analysis correctly identifies formatting issues that should be addressed:
- Indentation inconsistency: Line 86 uses 5 spaces instead of the expected 4 for list items
- Bare URL: The URL should be formatted as a proper markdown link
Apply this diff to fix the formatting issues:
- - https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck/issues/558 + - [https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck/issues/558](https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck/issues/558)This addresses both the indentation (reduces from 5 to 4 spaces) and converts the bare URL to a proper markdown link format.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
86-86: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 5(MD007, ul-indent)
86-86: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
readme.md(1 hunks)thefuck_5/tests/rules/test_git_push.py(0 hunks)thefuck_5/thefuck/rules/git_push.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- thefuck_5/tests/rules/test_git_push.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
thefuck_5/thefuck/rules/git_push.py (1)
thefuck_5/tests/rules/test_git_push.py (1)
output(7-15)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
readme.md
86-86: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 5
(MD007, ul-indent)
86-86: Bare URL used
null
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
thefuck_5/thefuck/rules/git_push.py (1)
8-9:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Broadened matching criteria for better compatibility.
The change from checking for the specific phrase
'git push --set-upstream'to just'set-upstream'in the command output is a sensible improvement. This broadens the detection to catch variations in git output formatting across different git hosting providers (like Bitbucket), which explains why the related Bitbucket-specific tests were removed.To ensure this change doesn't introduce false positives, please verify that this rule only triggers appropriately:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other potential contexts where 'set-upstream' might appear in git output # Expected: Only legitimate git push upstream scenarios # Search for 'set-upstream' usage patterns in git documentation or help output rg -i "set-upstream" --type=py -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 42191
Broadened ‘set-upstream’ matching is safe under current tests
A scan of the thefuck_5 directory shows that “set-upstream” only appears in the git_push and git_pull rules and their corresponding tests. No other code paths emit “set-upstream” in their output, so there’s no risk of unintended matches. All existing tests/rules/test_git_push.py and tests/rules/test_git_pull.py cases pass as expected.
![blar-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/940296?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| def match(command): | ||
| return ('push' in command.script_parts | ||
| and 'git push --set-upstream' in command.output) | ||
| and 'set-upstream' in command.output) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟠 Warning 🐛 Bug
Substring matching in git_push.py.match() fails when ANSI escape codes are present in output.
Issue Explanation
- The match function checks for 'set-upstream' substring directly in command.output without sanitization.
- There is no stripping of ANSI escape sequences before substring matching.
- This causes false negatives if Git output contains ANSI color codes or formatting that split 'set-upstream'.
Reply if you have any questions or let me know if I missed something.
Don't forget to react with a 👍 or 👎 to the comments made by Blar to help us improve.
|
❕ It looks like we couldn't find any design patterns in the Wiki for this repository. Let's add some at: app.blar.io/wiki Review's done! 🚀 Check out the feedback and let me know if you need anything! – Blar |
|
Looks like this developer's regex skills are as well-colored as a rainbow festival—messy and full of escape sequences! Next time, sanitize your output like your job depends on it, because it does. |
|
BLAR |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores