Add default WAF filter for lightfuzz

[liquidsec]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing dev (baseline) vs lightfuzz-performance (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	4.15ms	4.23ms	+1.8% ⚪	✅
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	18.16ms	18.37ms	+1.2% ⚪	✅
Large Closest Match Lookup	346.73ms	354.22ms	+2.2% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	189.41ms	190.34ms	+0.5% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	458.86ms	459.46ms	+0.1% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	835.64ms	811.70ms	-2.9% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	30.90ms	30.68ms	-0.7% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	317.56ms	314.11ms	-1.1% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	13.88ms	14.00ms	+0.9% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	4.070s	3.969s	-2.5% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.604s	9.502s	-1.1% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	4.266s	4.178s	-2.1% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	7.318s	7.233s	-1.1% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	3.20ms	3.15ms	-1.4% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	11.69ms	11.29ms	-3.4% ⚪	✅
Mixed Ip Operations	4.54ms	4.44ms	-2.1% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	62.79µs	61.35µs	-2.3% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	695.98µs	707.14µs	+1.6% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

✅ No significant performance changes detected (all changes <10%)

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.13

[TheTechromancer]

If we need to track which cloud providers are WAFs, this should be done in cloudcheck

[liquidsec]

is that possible now or do we want to hold for a cloudcheck feature?

[TheTechromancer]

Cloudcheck is about to get rustified so now is a good time to add it

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92%. Comparing base (212be84) to head (8ffd223).
⚠️ Report is 57 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
bbot/modules/lightfuzz/lightfuzz.py	50%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev   #2712   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     92%     92%   -0%     
=====================================
  Files        410     411    +1     
  Lines      33942   33955   +13     
=====================================
- Hits       31007   30966   -41     
- Misses      2935    2989   +54     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.