fixes issue #86: Decorators drawn when offset larger than line length#90
Open
plepe wants to merge 3 commits intobbecquet:masterfrom
Open
fixes issue #86: Decorators drawn when offset larger than line length#90plepe wants to merge 3 commits intobbecquet:masterfrom
plepe wants to merge 3 commits intobbecquet:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Hey managers of this repo. What's up?! Can we get this incorporated please? I would be happy to take over management of this repo if it is being left idle. Cheers. |
|
bump. please merge :) |
Author
|
I would be very surprised if there will be any updates in this repository. Personally, I'm using my own repository for my projects: https://github.com/plepe/Leaflet.PolylineDecorator |
|
since this is abandoned, I propose that we come up with a new generic name to publish this under and start fresh? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I just noticed the issue which already has been posted as #86. Before finding the pull request #87, which fixes this issue, I already found a different solution, which is much simpler and even reduces code instead of extending it.