Skip to content

Conversation

@jkaninda
Copy link
Contributor

@jkaninda jkaninda commented Oct 30, 2025

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

  • The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
  • The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
  • The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
  • The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
  • The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
  • Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

Pull Request content

  • The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
  • The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
  • As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

  • The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
  • I removed the following packages around my addition: (please give a short reason for each removal)

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added information about pg-bkup, a PostgreSQL backup, restore, and migration tool with multiple storage backends and GPG encryption support.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new PostgreSQL backup and migration tool entry (pg-bkup) was added to the README's "Software Packages" section. The addition describes a tool supporting multiple storage backends and GPG encryption for backup, restore, and migration operations.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation Update
README.md
Added pg-bkup entry to "Software Packages" section between ostent and PipeCD items

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • The change is a straightforward documentation addition with no logic, code, or structural modifications

Poem

🐰 A tool for backups, now in our tome,
With PostgreSQL treasures safe at home,
Through GPG vaults and storage wide,
pg-bkup joins with rabbit pride! 📚✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Add jkaninda/pg-bkup" is fully related to the main change in the pull request, which is adding a new PostgreSQL backup tool entry to the Software Packages section of the README. The title is concise and specific, clearly identifying the package being added without unnecessary noise. A teammate scanning the PR history would immediately understand that this PR introduces a new package listing to the awesome-go repository. The title directly reflects the primary change and meets the criteria for clarity and specificity.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

3379-3379: Minor wording polish for neutrality and style.

Looks good: correct section, alphabetical placement, and description ends with a period. To better match Awesome list tone, consider a more neutral/concise phrasing (lowercase “local”, use “backends”):

- - [pg-bkup](https://github.com/jkaninda/pg-bkup) - PostgreSQL backup, restore, and migration tool with support for Local, S3, FTP, SFTP, and Azure Blob Storage ensuring data security through GPG encryption.
+ - [pg-bkup](https://github.com/jkaninda/pg-bkup) - PostgreSQL backup, restore, and migration tool with local, S3, FTP, SFTP, and Azure Blob Storage backends, plus optional GPG encryption.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44263fc and 461745e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
README.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

README.md: When modifying the Awesome list, keep categories with at least three entries
Descriptions in the Awesome list must end with a period
Avoid promotional copy; keep descriptions concise and neutral in the Awesome list
Do not remove existing list content unless removal is requested and justified

Files:

  • README.md
**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Keep documentation in English

Files:

  • README.md
{README.md,COVERAGE.md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Align rendered documentation (README.md, COVERAGE.md, etc.) with behavior changes in main.go or helper packages

Files:

  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: quality

@github-actions
Copy link

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

  • Repo: OK
  • pkg.go.dev: OK
  • goreportcard: OK (grade unknown)
  • coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant