Skip to content

Extensions Framework & Orchestrate Anything #9752

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 193 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor

@harikrishna-patnala harikrishna-patnala commented Oct 1, 2024

Description

The Extensions Framework in Apache CloudStack is designed to provide a flexible and standardised mechanism for integrating external systems and custom workflows into CloudStack’s orchestration process. By defining structured hook points during key operations—such as virtual machine deployment, resource preparation, and lifecycle events—the framework allows administrators and developers to extend CloudStack’s behaviour without modifying its core codebase. This design specification outlines the architecture, payload structure, execution flow, and integration guidelines necessary to implement, register, and manage extensions effectively within the CloudStack environment.

For the initial implementation of the Extensions Framework, only Orchestrator-type extensions will be supported. These extensions enable seamless integration of external VM deployment and lifecycle management systems into CloudStack

A design document is made with more details at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Extensions+Framework+-++Orchestartor+or+External+Deployment+Integration

Documentation PR: apache/cloudstack-documentation#523

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Extensions List:

extensions

Create Extension Form:

create-extension

Extension View:
image

Add Custom Action Form:
add-custom-action

Run Custom Action Form:
run-custom-action

Run Action:
run-custom-action-instance

Built-in Extensions:
image

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.09581% with 2334 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.81%. Comparing base (3e3a0c0) to head (3c5a1f0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...work/extensions/manager/ExtensionsManagerImpl.java 59.23% 263 Missing and 154 partials ⚠️
...al/provisioner/ExternalPathPayloadProvisioner.java 60.03% 164 Missing and 37 partials ⚠️
...hypervisor/external/resource/ExternalResource.java 9.75% 184 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...udstack/agent/manager/ExternalTemplateAdapter.java 21.62% 112 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
.../external/discoverer/ExternalServerDiscoverer.java 38.15% 90 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...loudstack/agent/manager/ExternalServerPlanner.java 0.00% 80 Missing ⚠️
...n/java/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java 53.29% 51 Missing and 27 partials ⚠️
...n/java/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java 0.00% 74 Missing ⚠️
...che/cloudstack/api/response/ExtensionResponse.java 0.00% 73 Missing ⚠️
...ck/api/response/ExtensionCustomActionResponse.java 0.00% 72 Missing ⚠️
... and 91 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #9752      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     16.58%   16.81%   +0.23%     
- Complexity    13989    14403     +414     
============================================
  Files          5743     5806      +63     
  Lines        510706   515397    +4691     
  Branches      62119    62700     +581     
============================================
+ Hits          84689    86657    +1968     
- Misses       416543   418941    +2398     
- Partials       9474     9799     +325     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.84% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
unittests 17.73% <44.09%> (+0.25%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Oct 1, 2024
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Oct 1, 2024
Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11530

Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@harikrishna-patnala , I noticed I had started reviewing this and abandonned it. I was about half way anf will leave you the comments now. I will revisit after 4.20 is out.

@@ -67,6 +70,9 @@ public class UpdateHostCmd extends BaseCmd {
@Parameter(name = ApiConstants.ANNOTATION, type = CommandType.STRING, description = "Add an annotation to this host", since = "4.11", authorized = {RoleType.Admin})
private String annotation;

@Parameter(name = ApiConstants.EXTERNAL_DETAILS, type = CommandType.MAP, description = "Details in key/value pairs using format externaldetails[i].keyname=keyvalue. Example: externaldetails[0].endpoint.url=urlvalue", since = "4.21.0")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

details instead of external...

@@ -359,9 +362,21 @@ public Map<String, String> getDetails() {
}
}
}

detailsMap.putAll(getExternalDetails());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see? these are just details.

}

public void setDetails(Map<String, String> details) {
_details = details;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
_details = details;
this.details = details;

} else if (template.getFormat() == ImageFormat.BAREMETAL) {
logger.debug("%s has format [{}]. Skipping ROOT volume [{}] allocation.", template.toString(), ImageFormat.BAREMETAL, rootVolumeName);
} else if (template.getFormat() == ImageFormat.BAREMETAL || template.getFormat() == ImageFormat.EXTERNAL) {
logger.debug(String.format("%s has format [%s]. Skipping ROOT volume [%s] allocation.", template.toString(), template.getFormat(), rootVolumeName));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
logger.debug(String.format("%s has format [%s]. Skipping ROOT volume [%s] allocation.", template.toString(), template.getFormat(), rootVolumeName));
logger.debug("{} has format [{}]. Skipping ROOT volume [{}] allocation.", template.toString(), template.getFormat(), rootVolumeName);

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11592

@harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DaanHoogland I see many other custom detail parameters in a few other APIs, such as vnfdetails, domaindetails, accountdetails, and a few more.

In this case, I would like to keep this as a separate parameter because these are the only details that are important if the hypervisor type is External. The other parameters are just meant to fit into CloudStack's workflow. The core purpose of this feature is to send these external details to the external provisioner.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13658)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 58536 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9752-t13658-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 144 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@abh1sar
Copy link
Collaborator

abh1sar commented Jul 3, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13994

shwstppr added 2 commits July 3, 2025 11:52
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

shwstppr commented Jul 3, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@abh1sar
Copy link
Collaborator

abh1sar commented Jul 3, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shwstppr I won’t be getting through this today but have some questions so far. I will continue later.

@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ public enum State {
private int wait; //in second
private boolean bypassHostMaintenance = false;
private transient long requestSequence = 0L;
protected Map<String, Map<String, String>> externalDetails;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason these should be called externalDetails, and not just details?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DaanHoogland yes, externalDetails is more appropriate here as these are filtered details and used by extensions specific code. Many of the resources already have a details property and would be a bit confusing.
Also, Answer class that extends Command has a member named details

@@ -270,4 +270,6 @@ Network createPrivateNetwork(String networkName, String displayText, long physic
List<InternalLoadBalancerElementService> getInternalLoadBalancerElements();

boolean handleCksIsoOnNetworkVirtualRouter(Long virtualRouterId, boolean mount) throws ResourceUnavailableException;

String getNsxSegmentId(long domainId, long accountId, long zoneId, Long vpcId, long networkId);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this a rebase issue? seems unrelated.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe @harikrishna-patnala can give some insight on this. Probably idea is to get a VLAN ID equivalent identifier from SDNs and it should come from that SDN plugin instead defining it in NetworkService. I'll have a look

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its related to the PR only but specific to Nsx. yes, if we can move it to NetworkService, it will be good. thanks @shwstppr

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14007

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14009

@abh1sar
Copy link
Collaborator

abh1sar commented Jul 4, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14016

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

shwstppr commented Jul 4, 2025

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14025

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants