fix: restore Apache-2.0 license declaration in package.json - #35
Merged
Conversation
Align package.json with the LICENSE file, README, and the license published to npm, all of which say Apache 2.0. The MPL-2.0 value crept in during a wholesale reformat of package.json in #24 with no stated intent to relicense; this restores the original declaration so all three sources agree.
|
Minimum allowed line rate is |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
package.jsonlisted the wrong license; should beApache-2.0.The stray
MPL-2.0value was introduced in #24 during a reformat ofpackage.jsonunintentionally.No changes needed to
LICENSEorREADME.md; both already state Apache 2.0, and the README'sallons-y.studiolink style is preserved.