support lakefs solution docs #81
Conversation
WalkthroughA comprehensive lakeFS Data Version Control Solution Guide documentation file was added, covering installation, configuration, deployment, troubleshooting, best practices, and operational guidelines for the lakeFS system across various storage backends and environments. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md (2)
42-42: Simplify redundant phrase.The phrase "point in time" is redundant. Use either "point" or "time" instead.
Apply this diff:
-- **Commit**: A snapshot of the repository at a specific point in time +- **Commit**: A snapshot of the repository at a specific point in timeOr more concisely:
-- **Commit**: A snapshot of the repository at a specific point in time +- **Commit**: A snapshot of the repository at a specific moment in time
73-73: Improve sentence structure for clarity.Line 73 has an incomplete sentence structure. Add a period after "Portal" and capitalize the next sentence, or restructure for better flow.
Apply this diff:
- Download the lakeFS chart from the Marketplace in the Alauda Customer Portal and upload the lakeFS chart to your ACP catalog: + Download the lakeFS chart from the Marketplace in the Alauda Customer Portal, then upload it to your ACP catalog:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.29.0)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md
[high] 158-158: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md
[style] ~42-~42: This phrase is redundant. Consider writing “point” or “time”.
Context: ...napshot of the repository at a specific point in time - Merge: Combining changes from one...
(MOMENT_IN_TIME)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md
49-49: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
50-50: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
51-51: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
52-52: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md (1)
1-280: Document structure and content are well organized.The document provides comprehensive coverage of lakeFS deployment, configuration, and best practices. The overall structure follows a logical flow from background through troubleshooting and reference materials. Once the critical security issue and broken links are addressed, this will be a solid guide for users.
| | **Data Versioning** | Create repositories and commit changes | [Basic Operations](#basic-operations) | | ||
| | **Collaborative Development** | Use feature branches for isolated work | [Branching Strategy](#branching-strategy) | | ||
| | **Data Quality Validation** | Implement pre-commit hooks and testing | [Data Validation](#data-validation) | | ||
| | **Production Deployment** | Merge validated changes to main branch | [Production Workflows](#production-workflows) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix invalid link fragments in use case table.
The table references four internal sections that do not exist in this document: #basic-operations, #branching-strategy, #data-validation, and #production-workflows. These broken links degrade the user experience and navigation.
Consider either:
- Adding the referenced sections to the document, or
- Removing or updating the section references to point to the official lakeFS documentation
To resolve, update the table to reference external documentation or remove the links:
| Scenario | Recommended Approach | Section Reference |
|----------|---------------------|------------------|
-| **Data Versioning** | Create repositories and commit changes | [Basic Operations](#basic-operations) |
-| **Collaborative Development** | Use feature branches for isolated work | [Branching Strategy](#branching-strategy) |
-| **Data Quality Validation** | Implement pre-commit hooks and testing | [Data Validation](#data-validation) |
-| **Production Deployment** | Merge validated changes to main branch | [Production Workflows](#production-workflows) |
+| **Data Versioning** | Create repositories and commit changes | [Basic Operations](https://docs.lakefs.io/) |
+| **Collaborative Development** | Use feature branches for isolated work | [Branching Strategy](https://docs.lakefs.io/) |
+| **Data Quality Validation** | Implement pre-commit hooks and testing | [Data Validation](https://docs.lakefs.io/) |
+| **Production Deployment** | Merge validated changes to main branch | [Production Workflows](https://docs.lakefs.io/) |📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| | **Data Versioning** | Create repositories and commit changes | [Basic Operations](#basic-operations) | | |
| | **Collaborative Development** | Use feature branches for isolated work | [Branching Strategy](#branching-strategy) | | |
| | **Data Quality Validation** | Implement pre-commit hooks and testing | [Data Validation](#data-validation) | | |
| | **Production Deployment** | Merge validated changes to main branch | [Production Workflows](#production-workflows) | | |
| | **Data Versioning** | Create repositories and commit changes | [Basic Operations](https://docs.lakefs.io/) | | |
| | **Collaborative Development** | Use feature branches for isolated work | [Branching Strategy](https://docs.lakefs.io/) | | |
| | **Data Quality Validation** | Implement pre-commit hooks and testing | [Data Validation](https://docs.lakefs.io/) | | |
| | **Production Deployment** | Merge validated changes to main branch | [Production Workflows](https://docs.lakefs.io/) | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
49-49: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
50-50: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
51-51: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
52-52: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md around lines 49 to 52, the table
contains broken internal link fragments (#basic-operations, #branching-strategy,
#data-validation, #production-workflows); update those entries to either point
to the correct sections in this document (add the missing sections and anchors)
or replace the links with the corresponding official lakeFS documentation URLs
(or remove the link markup so only the plain text remains) so the table no
longer contains invalid fragments.
| access_key_id: QFKEJGDSGWFG44SL495W | ||
| secret_access_key: 67yy3SE5Epu2RC9EADlFIxedPcnO9AAglX8tYJyy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove or replace exposed credentials in example configuration.
The example configuration contains realistic-looking access credentials. Even if these are not real, this represents a security risk and should be replaced with placeholder text to prevent accidental credential exposure in documentation.
Apply this diff to replace the credentials with placeholders:
credentials:
- access_key_id: QFKEJGDSGWFG44SL495W
- secret_access_key: 67yy3SE5Epu2RC9EADlFIxedPcnO9AAglX8tYJyy
+ access_key_id: "<YOUR_ACCESS_KEY>"
+ secret_access_key: "<YOUR_SECRET_KEY>"Then add a note instructing users to replace these with their actual credentials from the Ceph user secret retrieval step (lines 115-119).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| access_key_id: QFKEJGDSGWFG44SL495W | |
| secret_access_key: 67yy3SE5Epu2RC9EADlFIxedPcnO9AAglX8tYJyy | |
| access_key_id: "<YOUR_ACCESS_KEY>" | |
| secret_access_key: "<YOUR_SECRET_KEY>" |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.29.0)
[high] 158-158: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/en/solutions/How_to_Use_lakeFS.md around lines 157-158, the example
shows literal access_key_id and secret_access_key values; replace them with
non-sensitive placeholders (e.g., ACCESS_KEY_ID_PLACEHOLDER and
SECRET_ACCESS_KEY_PLACEHOLDER) in the example configuration and ensure the
placeholders are clearly labeled as such, then add a brief note (referencing
lines 115-119) instructing users to replace these placeholders with their actual
credentials obtained from the Ceph user secret retrieval step.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.