Skip to content

Conversation

@t-wissmann
Copy link

This makes biblib work with python 3.10.

The Parser.parse() uses collections.abc per default (which is the only way in
python 3.10) and only falls back to the old collections.Iterable if
collections.abc does not exist.

This makes biblib work with python 3.10.

The Parser.parse() uses collections.abc per default (which is the only way in
python 3.10) and only falls back to the old collections.Iterable if
collections.abc does not exist.
@t-wissmann
Copy link
Author

Any news on this?

@t-wissmann
Copy link
Author

@aclements: is there any hope that this is merged? It should be only one click effort to merge this PR.

I'd love to use biblib also in the future, because it is the only bibtex parser that works reliably.

@t-wissmann
Copy link
Author

There are already 6 people waiting for this change to be merged. Is there any hope for it, @aclements?

@Flecart
Copy link

Flecart commented Apr 6, 2024

Could be useful if this gets merged.

@t-wissmann
Copy link
Author

I agree, those who need it can use my fork on https://github.com/t-wissmann/biblib in the meantime.

@Flecart
Copy link

Flecart commented Apr 6, 2024

At the end this is bad unmaintained code. So I ended up using https://github.com/sciunto-org/python-bibtexparser. For my https://github.com/flecart/obsidown.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants