Skip to content

Conversation

@abemedia
Copy link
Owner

@abemedia abemedia commented Feb 3, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e5f588b) 98.48% compared to head (7beaa41) 98.48%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #194   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.48%   98.48%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines         728      728           
=======================================
  Hits          717      717           
  Misses          6        6           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2024

Benchmark Results

.
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/abemedia/go-don
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                         │   before    │               after                │
                         │   sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base               │
Handler/Request-4          251.4n ± 1%   253.8n ± 2%  +0.97% (p=0.001 n=10)
Handler/RequestPointer-4   274.6n ± 0%   275.9n ± 1%  +0.51% (p=0.000 n=10)
Pool/Struct-4                            20.75n ± 0%
Pool/Pointer-4                           25.73n ± 0%
Pool_New/Struct-4                        29.05n ± 1%
Pool_New/Pointer-4                       50.31n ± 0%
Pool_Reset/Struct-4                      2.811n ± 0%
Pool_Reset/Pointer-4                     7.441n ± 0%
geomean                    262.7n        32.16n       +0.74%

                         │   before   │                after                │
                         │    B/op    │    B/op     vs base                 │
Handler/Request-4          24.00 ± 0%   24.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Handler/RequestPointer-4   24.00 ± 0%   24.00 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Pool/Struct-4                           0.000 ± 0%
Pool/Pointer-4                          0.000 ± 0%
Pool_New/Struct-4                       24.00 ± 0%
Pool_New/Pointer-4                      32.00 ± 0%
Pool_Reset/Struct-4                     0.000 ± 0%
Pool_Reset/Pointer-4                    0.000 ± 0%
geomean                    24.00                    +0.00%                ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

                         │   before   │                after                │
                         │ allocs/op  │ allocs/op   vs base                 │
Handler/Request-4          1.000 ± 0%   1.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Handler/RequestPointer-4   1.000 ± 0%   1.000 ± 0%       ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
Pool/Struct-4                           0.000 ± 0%
Pool/Pointer-4                          0.000 ± 0%
Pool_New/Struct-4                       1.000 ± 0%
Pool_New/Pointer-4                      2.000 ± 0%
Pool_Reset/Struct-4                     0.000 ± 0%
Pool_Reset/Pointer-4                    0.000 ± 0%
geomean                    1.000                    +0.00%                ²
¹ all samples are equal
² summaries must be >0 to compute geomean

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants