NPM Package Analysis: [email protected] #37
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Complete 11-section analysis report (1,370 lines) - Covers: architecture, API, entry points, functionality, dependencies - Includes: quality assessment, security analysis, integration guidelines - Quality Score: 9/10 - Analysis based on Repomix code extraction and manual review Co-authored-by: Zeeeepa <[email protected]>
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
codegen-sh
bot
force-pushed
the
npm-analysis
branch
from
c6a2653 to
e259d5a
Compare
- 11-section comprehensive analysis report - Architecture & entry points analysis - 28+ automation blocks documented - Full API documentation with examples - Security assessment and recommendations - Integration guidelines for multiple frameworks - Quality score: 7.5/10, Overall rating: 8/10 Co-authored-by: Zeeeepa <[email protected]>
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2 issues found across 2 files
Prompt for AI agents (all issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.
<file name="npm_analysis/packages/uniqhtt_analysis.md">
<violation number="1" location="npm_analysis/packages/uniqhtt_analysis.md:842">
P2: The claim that SOCKS5 proxy works in browsers is technically inaccurate. Browsers cannot use SOCKS5 proxies directly from JavaScript due to security restrictions - they only support HTTP-level proxying through browser settings, not programmatic SOCKS connections.</violation>
<violation number="2" location="npm_analysis/packages/uniqhtt_analysis.md:858">
P1: This code example demonstrates an SSRF vulnerability by directly using user-provided URL without validation. Documentation examples should include URL allowlisting or validation to avoid teaching insecure patterns.
Consider adding validation:
```javascript
const allowedHosts = ['api.example.com', 'data.example.com'];
const parsedUrl = new URL(req.params.url);
if (!allowedHosts.includes(parsedUrl.hostname)) {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Host not allowed' });
}
```</violation>
</file>
Reply to cubic to teach it or ask questions. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
| | HTTP/2 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | | ||
| | Cookie Persistence | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited | ❌ | | ||
| | Proxy (HTTP/HTTPS) | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | | ||
| | Proxy (SOCKS5) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: The claim that SOCKS5 proxy works in browsers is technically inaccurate. Browsers cannot use SOCKS5 proxies directly from JavaScript due to security restrictions - they only support HTTP-level proxying through browser settings, not programmatic SOCKS connections.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At npm_analysis/packages/uniqhtt_analysis.md, line 842:
<comment>The claim that SOCKS5 proxy works in browsers is technically inaccurate. Browsers cannot use SOCKS5 proxies directly from JavaScript due to security restrictions - they only support HTTP-level proxying through browser settings, not programmatic SOCKS connections.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,1073 @@
+| HTTP/2 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
+| Cookie Persistence | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited | ❌ |
+| Proxy (HTTP/HTTPS) | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
+| Proxy (SOCKS5) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
+| File Downloads | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited |
+| Web Crawler | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited |
</file context>
|
|
||
| app.get('/proxy/:url', async (req, res) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const response = await uniqhtt.get(req.params.url, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P1: This code example demonstrates an SSRF vulnerability by directly using user-provided URL without validation. Documentation examples should include URL allowlisting or validation to avoid teaching insecure patterns.
Consider adding validation:
const allowedHosts = ['api.example.com', 'data.example.com'];
const parsedUrl = new URL(req.params.url);
if (!allowedHosts.includes(parsedUrl.hostname)) {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Host not allowed' });
}Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At npm_analysis/packages/uniqhtt_analysis.md, line 858:
<comment>This code example demonstrates an SSRF vulnerability by directly using user-provided URL without validation. Documentation examples should include URL allowlisting or validation to avoid teaching insecure patterns.
Consider adding validation:
```javascript
const allowedHosts = ['api.example.com', 'data.example.com'];
const parsedUrl = new URL(req.params.url);
if (!allowedHosts.includes(parsedUrl.hostname)) {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Host not allowed' });
}
```</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,1073 @@
+
+app.get('/proxy/:url', async (req, res) => {
+ try {
+ const response = await uniqhtt.get(req.params.url, {
+ timeout: 5000,
+ enableCookieJar: false
</file context>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NPM Package Analysis: uniqhtt
Summary
Comprehensive analysis of the uniqhtt NPM package (v1.2.7) - an enterprise-grade HTTP client for Node.js, Web browsers, and edge computing environments.
Analysis Highlights
📊 Quality Score: 7.5/10
Key Findings:
📦 Package Stats:
🔑 Core Capabilities:
Analysis Sections Covered:
✅ Section 1: Package Overview
✅ Section 2: Installation & Setup
✅ Section 3: Architecture & Code Structure
✅ Section 4: Core Features & API (12 features documented)
✅ Section 5: Entry Points & Exports (detailed analysis)
✅ Section 6: Dependencies & Data Flow
✅ Section 7: Build & CI/CD Pipeline
✅ Section 8: Quality & Maintainability
✅ Section 9: Security Assessment
✅ Section 10: Integration & Usage Guidelines
✅ Section 11: Recommendations
✅ Section 12: Conclusion
Best Suited For:
Not Recommended For:
Files Added:
npm_analysis/packages/uniqhtt_analysis.md- Complete analysis report (1,073 lines)Methodology:
Analysis Date: 2025-12-28
Analyzer: Codegen NPM Analysis Agent
Package Version: [email protected]
💻 View my work • 👤 Initiated by @Zeeeepa • About Codegen
⛔ Remove Codegen from PR • 🚫 Ban action checks
Summary by cubic
Adds deep-dive NPM package analyses for [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected] to support package evaluation and integration decisions.
Written for commit 578ec7c. Summary will update automatically on new commits.