📚 Add WebChat2API Comprehensive Requirements & Integration Analysis #24
Conversation
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21624495 | Triggered | Company Email Password | 96c69db | ComputeTower/Requirements.md | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Comment |
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 2 files
Prompt for AI agents (all issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.
<file name="Tower/Integration-Analysis.md">
<violation number="1" location="Tower/Integration-Analysis.md:700">
P2: Security: The code example demonstrates command injection vulnerability by interpolating user input directly into shell commands. Since this is presented as a 'Recommended Integration Approach', developers may copy this insecure pattern. Consider using array-based spawn() or properly escaping arguments with a library like `shell-escape` in the documentation example.</violation>
</file>
Reply to cubic to teach it or ask questions. Re-run a review with @cubic-dev-ai review this PR
Tower/Integration-Analysis.md
Outdated
| // Code analysis | ||
| async analyzeCode(filePath: string) { | ||
| const { stdout } = await execAsync( | ||
| `python3 ../analyzer/Libraries/Analysis/analyzer.py --target ${filePath} --json` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: Security: The code example demonstrates command injection vulnerability by interpolating user input directly into shell commands. Since this is presented as a 'Recommended Integration Approach', developers may copy this insecure pattern. Consider using array-based spawn() or properly escaping arguments with a library like shell-escape in the documentation example.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At Tower/Integration-Analysis.md, line 700:
<comment>Security: The code example demonstrates command injection vulnerability by interpolating user input directly into shell commands. Since this is presented as a 'Recommended Integration Approach', developers may copy this insecure pattern. Consider using array-based spawn() or properly escaping arguments with a library like `shell-escape` in the documentation example.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,840 @@
+ // Code analysis
+ async analyzeCode(filePath: string) {
+ const { stdout } = await execAsync(
+ `python3 ../analyzer/Libraries/Analysis/analyzer.py --target ${filePath} --json`
+ );
+ return JSON.parse(stdout);
</file context>
ComputeTower is a dedicated WebChat2API module within the analyzer repository: Module Contents: - ComputeTower/Requirements.md: Complete functional specifications for WebChat2API - ComputeTower/Integration-Analysis.md: Integration analysis of Befly + OWL Browser (9.5/10 score) - README.md: Updated with detailed ComputeTower section Key Features: - AI-powered login automation with CAPTCHA solving - Natural language element discovery (no brittle selectors) - OpenAI-compatible API endpoints (/v1/chat/completions) - Session persistence with browser profiles - Multi-account support (100+ concurrent sessions) - Self-healing error recovery Technology Stack: - Befly Framework (TypeScript/Bun): API, database, authentication - OWL Browser SDK (TypeScript/Node): AI automation, session management - PostgreSQL + Redis for data and session management Note: ComputeTower is independent of analyzer's code analysis features. It focuses purely on web chat automation and API conversion. Co-authored-by: Zeeeepa <[email protected]>
codegen-sh
bot
force-pushed
the
codegen-bot/webchat2api-requirements-1734714600
branch
from
f37dac3 to
96c69db
Compare
- Architecture-Analysis.md: Comprehensive 35+ interconnection point analysis - package.json: Production dependencies (Playwright, Express, PostgreSQL, Redis) - .env.example: Complete environment configuration Key Features: - Befly-OWL Browser interconnection architecture - WebSocket real-time communication protocol - Async/parallel execution design (1000+ concurrent sessions) - Visual validation integration points - Error recovery and self-healing strategies - Database schemas and Redis cache patterns - Worker pool architecture for multi-threading All interconnection points documented: IP-01 through IP-36 covering: - Data flows (credentials, chat, sessions) - Communication protocols (REST, WebSocket) - Storage schemas (PostgreSQL, Redis) - Async execution patterns - Visual validation integration - Error recovery coordination Co-authored-by: Zeeeepa <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zeeeepa <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2 issues found across 3 files (changes from recent commits).
Prompt for AI agents (all issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them.
<file name="ComputeTower/.env.example">
<violation number="1" location="ComputeTower/.env.example:9">
P2: AES encryption key placeholder says '32-character' but the example is 38 characters. AES-256 requires exactly 32 bytes. Use a correct-length placeholder to avoid confusion.</violation>
<violation number="2" location="ComputeTower/.env.example:77">
P2: CORS wildcard (`*`) combined with `CORS_CREDENTIALS=true` is insecure. Consider using a restrictive placeholder like `http://localhost:3000` to encourage proper CORS configuration.</violation>
</file>
Reply to cubic to teach it or ask questions. Re-run a review with @cubic-dev-ai review this PR
| RATE_LIMIT_MAX_REQUESTS=100 | ||
|
|
||
| # CORS | ||
| CORS_ORIGIN=* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: CORS wildcard (*) combined with CORS_CREDENTIALS=true is insecure. Consider using a restrictive placeholder like http://localhost:3000 to encourage proper CORS configuration.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At ComputeTower/.env.example, line 77:
<comment>CORS wildcard (`*`) combined with `CORS_CREDENTIALS=true` is insecure. Consider using a restrictive placeholder like `http://localhost:3000` to encourage proper CORS configuration.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+RATE_LIMIT_MAX_REQUESTS=100
+
+# CORS
+CORS_ORIGIN=*
+CORS_CREDENTIALS=true
+
</file context>
| CORS_ORIGIN=* | |
| CORS_ORIGIN=http://localhost:3000 |
| # Security | ||
| JWT_SECRET=your-super-secret-jwt-key-change-this | ||
| JWT_EXPIRY=7d | ||
| AES_ENCRYPTION_KEY=your-32-character-encryption-key-here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: AES encryption key placeholder says '32-character' but the example is 38 characters. AES-256 requires exactly 32 bytes. Use a correct-length placeholder to avoid confusion.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At ComputeTower/.env.example, line 9:
<comment>AES encryption key placeholder says '32-character' but the example is 38 characters. AES-256 requires exactly 32 bytes. Use a correct-length placeholder to avoid confusion.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+# Security
+JWT_SECRET=your-super-secret-jwt-key-change-this
+JWT_EXPIRY=7d
+AES_ENCRYPTION_KEY=your-32-character-encryption-key-here
+
+# Database Configuration
</file context>
WebChat2API - Complete Requirements & Integration Analysis
🎯 Overview
This PR adds comprehensive documentation for the WebChat2API project, including:
📄 Files Added
1.
Tower/Requirements.mdComplete project requirements document including:
2.
Tower/Integration-Analysis.mdComprehensive integration analysis showing:
🎨 Key Highlights
Core Goal
Transform any web chat service (ChatGPT, Claude, K2Think.ai, etc.) into a standardized OpenAI API endpoint through intelligent browser automation.
Three-Component Architecture
Example Flow
User Input:
{ "url": "https://www.k2think.ai", "email": "[email protected]", "password": "developer123?" }System Actions:
Result:
💡 Why This Combination Works
Analyzer Brings:
Befly Brings:
OWL Browser Brings:
📊 Integration Score: 9.5/10
Breakdown:
🚀 Next Steps
📝 Notes
Ready for Review ✅
💻 View my work • 👤 Initiated by @Zeeeepa • About Codegen
⛔ Remove Codegen from PR • 🚫 Ban action checks
Summary by cubic
Add comprehensive docs and setup for ComputeTower WebChat2API, defining requirements, integration, and production architecture. Adds .env.example and package.json; covers Befly + OWL Browser interconnection, OpenAI-compatible endpoints, credential/session management, self-healing, README updates; clarifies ComputeTower does not use the analyzer’s code analysis features.
Written for commit 2b06aa1. Summary will update automatically on new commits.