Skip to content

Rename torque_command to direct_torque #362

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: torque_control
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

urfeex
Copy link
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented Jul 16, 2025

The script command has been renamed in the controller.

The script command has been renamed in the controller.
@urfeex urfeex requested a review from a team July 16, 2025 07:19
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (torque_control@804e75a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             torque_control     #362   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   75.97%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?       92           
  Lines                     ?     4212           
  Branches                  ?      459           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?     3200           
  Misses                    ?      779           
  Partials                  ?      233           
Flag Coverage Δ
start_ursim 81.50% <ø> (?)
ur5-3.14.3 74.80% <ø> (?)
ur5e-10.7.0 69.76% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@URJala URJala self-requested a review July 30, 2025 12:43
@urfeex
Copy link
Member Author

urfeex commented Jul 30, 2025

I'm not sure whether that change as made it to the PolyScope 5 Beta program, so I'm a bit hesitating on merging this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants