Skip to content

chore(ci): add PR auto-labeler#366

Merged
wry-ry merged 1 commit intoUniversal-Commerce-Protocol:mainfrom
wry-ry:main
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): add PR auto-labeler#366
wry-ry merged 1 commit intoUniversal-Commerce-Protocol:mainfrom
wry-ry:main

Conversation

@wry-ry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@wry-ry wry-ry commented Apr 17, 2026

Description

Auto-label PRs based on their conventional commit types. Add enhancement label to feat, and documentation label to docs. This is used for categorization of PRs in release notes.

@wry-ry wry-ry marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2026 05:26
@wry-ry wry-ry requested review from a team as code owners April 17, 2026 05:26
@wry-ry wry-ry requested a review from jingyli April 17, 2026 05:27
@ptiper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ptiper commented Apr 17, 2026

@wry-ry FYI yesterday I started tagging PRs from/for devops with a new label across repos ("devops") and used "WIP" to mark some of the ones I knew we were still working on.

Comment thread .github/workflows/auto-label.yml Outdated
} else if (/^docs(\([^)]+\))?!?:/.test(title)) {
labelsToAdd.push('documentation');
} else if (/^fix(\([^)]+\))?!?:/.test(title)) {
labelsToAdd.push('bug'); // Change this to 'fix' if you don't use the default 'bug' label
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we planning to formalize the use of bug label in UCP? If yes, we should also consider extending the release notes template and also remove the comment here after the semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I forgot to delete this from the template I copied it from. This PR should just be for docs and features.

@wry-ry wry-ry merged commit 411dd70 into Universal-Commerce-Protocol:main Apr 20, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants