[YouTube] add new deobfuscation function name regex #1302
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adds a new regex to find the name of the deobfuscation function for throttling, which works for the `59b252b9` player. Closes: TeamNewPipe#1289
ShareASmile
added
bug
FineFindus
added a commit
to FineFindus/LibreTube
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2025
Updates the NewPipeExtractor to the lastest version of our fork to include the improvements to the signature and throttling issues. Ref: TeamNewPipe/NewPipeExtractor#1290 Ref: TeamNewPipe/NewPipeExtractor#1302
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a new regex to find the name of the deobfuscation function for throttling, which works for the
59b252b9player. This matches greedily against most of the long function body, which may lead to performance issues. I'm not quite sure if I would be better to find the name another way, as I wasn't sure how 'stable' the rest of the code is :)Closes: #1289