Skip to content

Pin marker-mutated macro prompt evidence#89

Merged
wolfiesch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ui-interaction-marker-macro-prompt-evidence
May 9, 2026
Merged

Pin marker-mutated macro prompt evidence#89
wolfiesch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ui-interaction-marker-macro-prompt-evidence

Conversation

@wolfiesch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • pin the marker-cell-mutated macro security prompt probe and sidecar evidence in the current OOXML evidence bundle
  • require that marker macro sidecar in the current supported-claim guard
  • refresh the fidelity plan with 191-report bundle and 24 targeted UI-interaction paths

Evidence

  • raw probe: /tmp/wolfxl-ui-interaction-marker-macro-20260509/interactive-probe-report.json
  • sidecar audit: /tmp/wolfxl-ui-interaction-evidence-marker-macro-20260509.json
  • bundle audit: /tmp/wolfxl-current-evidence-bundle-audit-marker-macro-ui-20260509.json (ready=true, 191 reports, 0 issues)
  • completion guard: /tmp/wolfxl-completion-current-marker-macro-ui-20260509.json (current_supported_claim_ready=true, exhaustive_claim_ready=false, 4 open requirements)

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • uv run --no-sync python scripts/audit_ooxml_evidence_bundle.py Plans/ooxml-current-evidence-bundle.json --strict > /tmp/wolfxl-current-evidence-bundle-audit-marker-macro-ui-20260509.json
  • uv run --no-sync python scripts/audit_ooxml_completion_claim.py Plans/ooxml-current-evidence-bundle.json --strict-current-evidence > /tmp/wolfxl-completion-current-marker-macro-ui-20260509.json
  • uv run --no-sync pytest tests/test_ooxml_evidence_bundle.py tests/test_ooxml_completion_claim.py tests/test_ooxml_interactive_evidence.py -q
  • uv run --with ruff ruff check scripts/audit_ooxml_completion_claim.py tests/test_ooxml_completion_claim.py tests/test_ooxml_evidence_bundle.py tests/test_ooxml_interactive_evidence.py

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 9, 2026 16:53
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Pins the new marker-cell-mutated macro security prompt UI-interaction probe and its audited sidecar into the current OOXML evidence bundle, and tightens the “current supported claim” guardrail to require that new evidence.

Changes:

  • Added a new pinned UI-interaction probe artifact for marker-cell-mutated macro prompt handling and an associated audit_ooxml_interactive_evidence.py sidecar report.
  • Updated the completion-claim audit to require the new marker-macro sidecar evidence as part of the “current supported claim” requirements.
  • Refreshed the fidelity-gap discovery plan text to reflect the updated evidence bundle counts and the expanded UI-interaction coverage list.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
scripts/audit_ooxml_completion_claim.py Requires the new excel_ui_interaction_marker_macro_evidence report for the current supported-claim readiness gate and updates the explanatory text.
Plans/real-world-excel-fidelity-gap-discovery.md Updates the plan narrative and inventory to include the new marker-macro UI-interaction evidence and refreshed bundle counts.
Plans/ooxml-current-evidence-bundle.json Pins the marker-macro UI-interaction probe report and its audited evidence sidecar into the current evidence bundle manifest.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@wolfiesch wolfiesch merged commit 8a1828b into main May 9, 2026
13 checks passed
@wolfiesch wolfiesch deleted the ui-interaction-marker-macro-prompt-evidence branch May 9, 2026 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants