Skip to content

Conversation

HangyuanLiu
Copy link
Contributor

@HangyuanLiu HangyuanLiu commented Aug 1, 2025

Why I'm doing:

Remove unused Analyzer class and related code

What I'm doing:

This pull request removes the Analyzer class and all associated references, replacing its functionality with alternative approaches. The changes streamline the codebase by eliminating deprecated and redundant code, simplifying table alias generation, and modifying how tuple descriptors and partition information are handled.

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.5
    • 3.4
    • 3.3

@HangyuanLiu HangyuanLiu requested review from a team as code owners August 1, 2025 01:52
Seaven
Seaven previously approved these changes Aug 1, 2025
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 35 / 41 (85.37%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/load/Load.java 7 12 58.33% [252, 253, 254, 255, 701]
🔵 com/starrocks/load/ExportJob.java 2 3 66.67% [530]
🔵 com/starrocks/planner/StreamLoadPlanner.java 3 3 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/plan/PlanFragmentBuilder.java 9 9 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/planner/FileScanNode.java 6 6 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/LoadPlanner.java 4 4 100.00% []
🔵 com/starrocks/planner/StreamLoadScanNode.java 4 4 100.00% []

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@alvin-celerdata alvin-celerdata merged commit 9598b34 into StarRocks:main Aug 1, 2025
74 of 75 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants