Add Spatial Continuity Prototype

[paulhdk]

Add Spatial Continuity Prototype

♻️ Current situation & Problem

Add the Spatial Continuity prototype.

⚙️ Release Notes

• Spatial Continuity visionOS app
• Spatial Continuity Camera iOS app

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By creating and submitting this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[paulhdk]

@PSchmiedmayer I have a few question re: the CI and was hoping you might have some pointers:

• How can we set up the CodeQL and fastlane to support multiple schemas? In my case, one for the visionOS app and one for the iOS app, i.e., two different apps, not the same app on multiple platforms.
• The periphery workflow doesn't appear to work because I have a Xcode project and not a Swift package project (?). Maybe we need to a add a mechanism here to pass the --project option? https://github.com/StanfordBDHG/.github/blob/main/.github/workflows/periphery.yml

[PSchmiedmayer]

@paulhdk Thank you for continuing the work here!

• Fastlane & CodeQL: You should be able to modify the fast file to cover this track; I assume it is mainly about duplicating the work in the build action to build the one first, then the second one.
• Regarding periphery: We have that working in multiple apps, e.g. the PAWS project (GitHub action + configuration file)

[paulhdk]

@paulhdk Thank you for continuing the work here!

• Fastlane & CodeQL: You should be able to modify the fast file to cover this track; I assume it is mainly about duplicating the work in the build action to build the one first, then the second one.

• Regarding periphery: We have that working in multiple apps, e.g. the PAWS project (GitHub action + configuration file)

Thank you! I believe I was able to get it running.
I've disabled CodeQL for now as it does not appear to support the current Swift toolchain yet. See github/codeql#20446.

Do you know why the REUSE Compliance Check is showing up twice in the workflow runs?

PR is ready for review now!

[PSchmiedmayer]

Nice; great job here @paulhdk!

I had a few minor comments on the setup; the code looks clean and well organized!

Happy to see this merged once the comments are addressed. I also fixed the REUSE GitHub action showing up twice and adjusted the required workflows. Totally fine to not have the CodeQL setup for now, let's hope they support Swift 6.2 soon ...

[paulhdk]

Thanks for your comments, @PSchmiedmayer! I've addressed them all apart from the question above. PTAL.

[PSchmiedmayer]

Thank you @paulhdk 🚀
Seems like the REUSE check also fails for the new image, once this and the TUM image is solved I can also merge the PR with admin permissions if there are no other things left to do 👍

[paulhdk]

Thank you @paulhdk 🚀 Seems like the REUSE check also fails for the new image, once this and the TUM image is solved I can also merge the PR with admin permissions if there are no other things left to do 👍

Done. Good to go from my side!