AT-24 Declassify two "beta" rules: S6539 and S6548

[asya-vorobeva]

• S6539: promote status from beta to ready
• S6548: deprecate rule, clear default quality profiles

[hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod]

AT-24

[gitar-bot]

CI failed: The CI build failed because the 'autoscan' test reports are out of sync with the rule metadata changes in this PR. Regenerating the test resources will resolve the mismatch.

Overview

The CI build failure in the 'Autoscan Tests' job is caused by a regression test mismatch. Modifying the metadata for rules S6539 and S6548 caused the generated 'autoscan' report to differ from the baseline stored in the repository.

Failures

Autoscan Report Diff Mismatch (confidence: high)

• Type: test
• Affected jobs: 84085917506
• Related to change: yes
• Root cause: The PR updates rule metadata, which is captured in the 'autoscan' regression test output. The stored expected output (baseline) was not updated to reflect these changes.
• Suggested fix: Locally execute the tests responsible for generating the 'autoscan' reports. Once generated, overwrite the files in src/test/resources/autoscan/ with the new output and include these changes in your commit.

Summary

• Change-related failures: 1 (Autoscan regression failure due to stale test resources).
• Infrastructure/flaky failures: 0.
• Recommended action: Regenerate the 'autoscan' regression test artifacts locally and commit the updated files to the branch.

Code Review ✅ Approved

Promotes S6539 to ready status and deprecates S6548 by removing it from default quality profiles. No issues found.

Tip

Comment Gitar fix CI or enable auto-apply: gitar auto-apply:on

Options

Auto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch.
Display: compact → Showing less information.

Comment with these commands to change:

Auto-apply	Compact
gitar auto-apply:on	gitar display:verbose

_{Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar}

[sonarqube-next]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube