IE-509: added unit test cases and PR check CI#4
Conversation
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive unit test coverage and CI automation for the migration utility scripts. The changes include tests for vault schema, service accounts, roles, policies, and connections migration functionality, along with a GitHub Actions workflow to run tests on pull requests.
Key changes:
- Added unit test files covering 10+ migration modules with 95%+ coverage requirement
- Fixed a quote style inconsistency in
migrate_connections.pyprint statement - Implemented PR check CI workflow using GitHub Actions with pytest and coverage reporting
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 15 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/test_update_vault_schema.py | Tests for vault schema update functionality including success, error handling, and script execution paths |
| tests/test_update_service_account.py | Tests for service account updates covering metadata updates, role assignment, and error scenarios |
| tests/test_update_role.py | Tests for role update operations including metadata changes and policy assignment |
| tests/test_update_policy_main.py | Tests for policy update main execution flow with various input scenarios |
| tests/test_update_policy.py | Tests for policy payload transformation logic |
| tests/test_migrate_vault_schema.py | Tests for vault schema migration including config file handling and governance migration |
| tests/test_migrate_vault_roles_and_policies.py | Tests for migrating vault roles and policies together |
| tests/test_migrate_service_accounts.py | Tests for service account migration with role assignment |
| tests/test_migrate_roles.py | Comprehensive tests for role migration including system roles and custom roles |
| tests/test_migrate_policies.py | Tests for policy migration with rule transformation |
| tests/test_migrate_connections.py | Tests for connection migration covering multiple scenarios and modes |
| tests/conftest.py | Pytest configuration to set up Python path and working directory |
| pytest.ini | Pytest configuration with coverage requirements set to 95% |
| migrate_connections.py | Fixed quote style inconsistency in print statement |
| .github/workflows/ci.yml | CI workflow configuration for running tests on pull requests |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
skyflow-vivek
left a comment
skyflow-vivek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I observed that most unit tests, we are setting up mocks in following manner:
my_mock = MagicMock(); my_mock.foo.bar = <value>; my_mock.foo1.bar1 = {}
Can we break these statements into separate lines like
my_mock = MagicMock()
my_mock.foo.bar = <value>
my_mock.foo1.bar1 = {}
|
✅ Gitleaks Findings: No secrets detected. Safe to proceed! |
IE-509: added unit test cases and PR check CI