Add Getting Started section to readme #28
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Shane32 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the project documentation by adding a new "Getting Started" section to the README. This section provides a step-by-step guide for installing the NuGet package, registering GraphQL services using dependency injection, and creating DI-based resolvers with sample code. The existing "Setup" section is also revised into a numbered list with improved formatting and clarity. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
72-73: Refine the wording for clarity.
The bullet point "Resolver code is mixed together with your data model" may be a bit wordy. Consider using a shorter alternative such as "Resolver code is combined with your data model" to enhance clarity and conciseness.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~73-~73: ‘mixed together’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ed an antipattern 2. Resolver code is mixed together with your data model ### Code-First ...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_MIXED_TOGETHER)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~73-~73: ‘mixed together’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ed an antipattern 2. Resolver code is mixed together with your data model ### Code-First ...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_MIXED_TOGETHER)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (windows-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
9-39: Great addition to the Getting Started section!
The new "Getting Started" section provides clear, step-by-step instructions that are easy to follow. The installation command, DI registration example, and resolver implementation sample are all well-organized and enhance the onboarding experience.
395-429: Setup section is comprehensive and clear.
The revised numbered steps along with the formatted code samples make it very accessible. One minor suggestion would be to replace "if/as needed" with "if applicable" for improved consistency and readability.
Coverage Report
|
Summary by CodeRabbit