Add initial page about IdP support#95
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @sumit-bose, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces comprehensive documentation for SSSD's Identity Provider (IdP) support. It outlines how SSSD integrates with OAuth2.0/OIDC-based IdPs such as Keycloak and EntraID to facilitate user management and authentication at the system level. The changes include a dedicated introductory page with configuration examples and an update to the overall SSSD documentation structure to reflect this new capability. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces initial documentation for SSSD's Identity Provider (IdP) support, which is a valuable addition. The changes include a new introduction page, updates to the table of contents, and modifications to the main introduction to mention this new feature. My review focuses on improving the clarity, grammar, and correctness of the new documentation. I've pointed out several typos in the configuration examples which are critical to fix, as they would prevent users from successfully using them. Other suggestions aim to improve readability and consistency.
danlavu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some parts are a little unclear. Have you looked at this with an RST viewer? github's processing is linking the entire page. It may just be an issue with github though.
danlavu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, I looked at all of Gemini's grammatical suggestions. They look correct, so I would make those changes as well.
Hi, all suggestions are included in the latest version. bye, |
|
Thank you, ACK. |
No description provided.