Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 5 vulnerabilities#59

Open
MManke188 wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-9def7c440a4d3d7d5b681f5c8b82dc7a
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 5 vulnerabilities#59
MManke188 wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-9def7c440a4d3d7d5b681f5c8b82dc7a

Conversation

@MManke188
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 5 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • frontend/package.json
  • frontend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-CROSSSPAWN-8303230
  756  
high severity Command Injection
SNYK-JS-GLOB-14040952
  706  
low severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-WEBPACK-15235959
  498  
low severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-WEBPACK-15235969
  498  
low severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-9789073
  436  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Command Injection
🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 10, 2026 13:46
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This Snyk-generated PR attempts to remediate 5 reported npm dependency vulnerabilities in the frontend workspace by upgrading Angular build tooling packages.

Changes:

  • Bumps @angular-devkit/build-angular from ^17.3.1 to ^20.3.15.
  • Bumps @angular/cli from ^17.3.1 to ^20.3.15.
  • Regenerates frontend/package-lock.json accordingly.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
frontend/package.json Upgrades Angular build tooling/CLI versions as part of the vulnerability remediation.
frontend/package-lock.json Updates the resolved dependency graph to match the upgraded Angular tooling.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread frontend/package.json
Comment on lines +65 to 69
"@angular-devkit/build-angular": "^20.3.15",
"@angular/animations": "^17.3.1",
"@angular/cli": "^17.3.1",
"@angular/cli": "^20.3.15",
"@angular/common": "^17.3.1",
"@angular/compiler": "^17.3.1",
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Upgrading only @angular-devkit/build-angular and @angular/cli to v20 while keeping the rest of @angular/* (including @angular/compiler-cli) at v17 will put the workspace in an unsupported mixed-major state. The resulting lockfile pulls in Angular 20 tooling that has peer deps on @angular/core/@angular/compiler-cli ^20 and requires Node >=20.19 and TypeScript >=5.8, which conflicts with the current Angular 17/TypeScript 5.4 setup and the repo’s .nvmrc (v20.8.0). Either complete an Angular major upgrade (align all @angular/*, TS, and Node) or avoid the major bump and instead remediate the vulnerable transitive deps via compatible upgrades/overrides.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants