Skip to content

Conversation

@carenas
Copy link
Contributor

@carenas carenas commented Oct 28, 2025

DO NOT MERGE

an early draft to help discussion on design, not even tested

See zherczeg/sljit#349 for context

SLJIT platform names used to be 64 bytes wide, but had since
grown.

Add a new header to keep track of those internal API numbers
and use that to size the needed buffers accurately.

While at it, do the same for the standalone JIT test which
used by default a more realistic power of 2 buffer size.
@NWilson
Copy link
Member

NWilson commented Oct 30, 2025

I will close this in favour of Carlo's second PR, which has conflicts with this.

@NWilson NWilson closed this Oct 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants