Skip to content

Conversation

@embediver
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes the mctp-rs dependencies (mctp, mctp-estack) to the upstream repository, which contains the necessary changes by now.

Note: I would prefer to just keep the mctp-rs fork active for now, since we might have a few additions and changes regarding the MCTP Control Protocol, that I would like to have in the upstream crates. Using the OpenPRoT mctp-rs fork for the upstreaming process would be good IMO.

@embediver embediver requested a review from FerralCoder December 8, 2025 09:39
@wmaroneAMD wmaroneAMD self-requested a review December 11, 2025 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants