Skip to content

Conversation

timosachsenberg
Copy link
Contributor

@timosachsenberg timosachsenberg commented Aug 7, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Significantly expanded and restructured the README to provide comprehensive guidance on documentation architecture, build instructions, CI/CD workflows, development practices, Binder integration, troubleshooting, and contribution guidelines.
    • Added a detailed table of contents and removed outdated installation and nightly build instructions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The README.md file was significantly expanded and restructured, transforming it from a brief overview into a comprehensive documentation guide. The update introduces detailed sections on documentation architecture, build instructions, CI/CD workflows, development guidelines, troubleshooting, and contribution processes, replacing the previous minimal content.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
README Overhaul
README.md
Expanded and reorganized README with new sections: documentation structure, build instructions, Sphinx config, notebook pipeline, CI/CD workflows, development guide, Binder integration, dependencies, troubleshooting, help resources, and contribution guidelines. Removed previous brief installation notes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐇
Hopping through docs, I found a guide,
With sections deep and pathways wide.
From build to test, each step is clear,
For every dev who ventures here.
Now README shines, a beacon bright—
Let’s build and write from day to night!
📚✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch add_doc

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

35-54: Specify language for fenced repo-tree block

The ASCII tree is inside a code fence without a language tag, triggering MD040.
Add text (or none) after the opening back-ticks to silence the linter and improve syntax-highlighting consistency.

-```
+```text
 pyopenms-docs/
 ├── .github/workflows/       # CI/CD pipelines
 …
 └── postBuild             # Binder post-installation script
-```
+```

296-299: Replace bare URLs with Markdown links

Bare URLs at Binder and “Getting Help” sections violate MD034 and reduce readability. Wrap them in standard Markdown link syntax.

-- Latest: https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/master+ipynb
-- Specific branch: Replace `master+ipynb` with branch name
+- **Latest Binder**: [Launch](https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/master+ipynb)
+- **Specific branch**: replace `master+ipynb` in the URL with the desired branch.

-**Issues**: https://github.com/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/issues
-**Discord**: https://discord.com/invite/4TAGhqJ7s5
-**Documentation**: https://pyopenms.readthedocs.io/
+**Issues**: <https://github.com/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/issues>  
+**Discord**: <https://discord.com/invite/4TAGhqJ7s5>  
+**Documentation**: <https://pyopenms.readthedocs.io/>

Also applies to: 340-342

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2332706 and 3cad2c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

14-14: Link fragments should be valid

(MD051, link-fragments)


36-36: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


297-297: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


340-340: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


341-341: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


342-342: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

355-357: Verify licence filename

The link points to License.txt, but many repositories use LICENSE or LICENSE.txt. Please confirm the exact filename to avoid a 404.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)

12-21: Keep the Table of Contents in sync with the document

Dependencies, Contributing, and License are top-level sections (Lines 299, 343, 354) but are missing from the TOC (Lines 14-21). This creates broken in-page links if someone adds them later with an anchor generator and can confuse readers who skim the TOC for those topics.
Consider regenerating the TOC automatically (e.g. with doctoc or markdown-toc) or manually adding the missing entries.


34-36: Add a language hint to the fenced code block

markdownlint flags MD040 because the tree listing fence lacks a language.
A simple “text” spec keeps syntax highlighters neutral while silencing the linter.

-```
+```text

295-296: Wrap the bare Binder URL in Markdown link syntax

MD034 warns about bare links. Wrapping the URL improves readability and passes linters.

- - Latest: https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/master+ipynb
+ - Latest: [Binder ‑ latest](https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/master+ipynb)

339-341: Convert bare reference links to proper Markdown links

Replace the three bare URLs with explicit link syntax to satisfy MD034:

- - **Issues**: https://github.com/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/issues
- - **Discord**: https://discord.com/invite/4TAGhqJ7s5
- - **Documentation**: https://pyopenms.readthedocs.io/
+ - **Issues**: <https://github.com/OpenMS/pyopenms-docs/issues>
+ - **Discord**: <https://discord.com/invite/4TAGhqJ7s5>
+ - **Documentation**: <https://pyopenms.readthedocs.io/>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3cad2c5 and b821069.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

35-35: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


296-296: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


339-339: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


340-340: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


341-341: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

5-11: Nice improvement – broken Installation anchor resolved

The earlier review flagged a missing Installation section.
That link has been removed from the TOC, eliminating the MD051 violation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants