Fix #1867: Added test for ProjectTypeDashboardCard Components #2003
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new unit test suite for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changesNo out-of-scope changes found. Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (6)📓 Common learnings📚 Learning: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-06-30T00:55:03.133ZApplied to files:
🔇 Additional comments (15)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx (1)
386-406: Redundant title mapping tests.These tests duplicate the functionality already covered in the "Conditional Rendering Logic" section (lines 96-116). The title mapping is already thoroughly tested there.
Consider removing this section to avoid test duplication:
- describe('Title Mapping Logic', () => { - it('correctly maps healthy type to Healthy title', () => { - render(<ProjectTypeDashboardCard type="healthy" count={10} icon={faHeartPulse} />) - - expect(screen.getByTestId('card-title')).toHaveTextContent('Healthy') - }) - - it('correctly maps needsAttention type to Need Attention title', () => { - render( - <ProjectTypeDashboardCard type="needsAttention" count={5} icon={faExclamationTriangle} /> - ) - - expect(screen.getByTestId('card-title')).toHaveTextContent('Need Attention') - }) - - it('correctly maps unhealthy type to Unhealthy title', () => { - render(<ProjectTypeDashboardCard type="unhealthy" count={2} icon={faSkull} />) - - expect(screen.getByTestId('card-title')).toHaveTextContent('Unhealthy') - }) - })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1714
File: frontend/src/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.tsx:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T17:07:50.988Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, union types for component props are not necessary when they would require creating separate type definitions. The project prefers inline prop type definitions even for props with specific string values, maintaining consistency with the single-use component prop pattern.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Learnt from: kasya
PR: OWASP/Nest#1680
File: frontend/src/components/SponsorCard.tsx:3-3
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T00:55:03.133Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, interfaces or types are not created for component props that are used only once. Inline prop type definitions are preferred for single-use cases.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a safety check t...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp/nest project, interfaces or types are not created for component props that are used onl...
Learnt from: kasya
PR: OWASP/Nest#1680
File: frontend/src/components/SponsorCard.tsx:3-3
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T00:55:03.133Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, interfaces or types are not created for component props that are used only once. Inline prop type definitions are preferred for single-use cases.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (15)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/ProjectTypeDashboardCard.test.tsx (15)
1-6: LGTM! Proper imports and dependencies.The imports are well-structured, including all necessary testing utilities, React, FontAwesome icons, and the component under test. The setup follows standard React Testing Library patterns.
7-25: Well-implemented Next.js Link mock.The mock correctly simulates Next.js Link behavior by rendering a standard anchor element with all necessary props passed through. This allows testing of href attributes and link functionality without Next.js router dependencies.
27-54: Comprehensive SecondaryCard mock with good testability.The mock implementation provides excellent testability by:
- Exposing props as data attributes for easy assertion
- Maintaining the expected DOM structure with title and content sections
- Serializing complex props like icons for verification
56-65: Clean test setup with appropriate base props.The base props provide a good foundation for testing, and the
beforeEachcleanup ensures test isolation. The use ofas constfor the type prop maintains type safety.
67-94: Essential rendering tests cover core functionality well.These tests effectively verify the component's basic rendering capabilities, including proper integration with SecondaryCard, correct text content, and link structure. The assertions are specific and meaningful.
96-116: Comprehensive conditional rendering coverage.The tests properly verify that each project type renders the correct title, covering all three variants (healthy, needsAttention, unhealthy) as specified in the PR objectives.
118-159: Thorough prop-based behavior testing.These tests excellently cover how different props affect component output, including count variations, icon changes, and URL generation for each type. The use of
rerenderfor testing prop changes is efficient and appropriate.
161-178: Event handling tests verify link functionality.The tests confirm that the component renders as a clickable link with correct href attributes. The click simulation ensures the link maintains functionality after user interaction.
180-192: Good coverage of edge cases for count values.These tests handle zero and large count values, ensuring the component gracefully displays various numeric inputs as mentioned in the PR objectives.
194-223: Comprehensive edge case testing.The tests cover negative numbers, very large values, and all type variants systematically. The loop-based approach for testing all types is efficient and thorough.
225-246: Accessibility tests ensure semantic structure.These tests verify that the component maintains proper accessibility by rendering semantic link elements and providing meaningful destinations, addressing the PR objective for accessibility compliance.
248-325: Excellent CSS class verification covering all styling scenarios.The tests comprehensively verify:
- Base classes on link elements
- Responsive design classes
- Conditional styling for each project type (healthy, unhealthy, needsAttention)
- Proper Tailwind CSS class application
This thorough coverage ensures UI integrity as specified in the PR objectives.
327-356: Strong component integration testing.These tests verify proper integration with SecondaryCard, including correct prop passing, content structure, and component hierarchy. This ensures the component works correctly within the larger system.
358-384: Type safety tests ensure robust TypeScript compliance.The tests verify that only valid type values are accepted and different icon types work correctly, ensuring type safety and preventing runtime errors.
408-433: Performance tests add valuable stability coverage.These tests ensure the component handles multiple re-renders and rapid prop changes gracefully, which is important for a dashboard component that may receive frequent updates.
|
…WASP#2003) * Added test for ProjectTypeDashboardCard Component * Refactor test and removed redundant from test --------- Co-authored-by: Kate Golovanova <[email protected]>
Resolves #1867
Description
Added Unit Tests for ProjectTypeDashboardCard Component
Added comprehensive test suite with 32 test cases covering:
Checklist
make check-testlocally; all checks and tests passed.