Test/anchorTitle unit tests #1999
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Added 40+ test cases covering rendering, props, events, and edge cases - Test scroll behavior, URL hash handling, and browser history updates - Include accessibility, performance, and integration test coverage - Mock external dependencies (slugify, FontAwesome, browser APIs) - Verify proper cleanup of event listeners and focus management
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new comprehensive test suite for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Note 🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/AnchorTitle.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithya-naik
PR: OWASP/Nest#1894
File: frontend/src/components/TopContributorsList.tsx:74-74
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T14:51:14.736Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, the maintainer adithya-naik prefers not to create separate components for code that's only used in two specific cases, following the YAGNI principle to avoid over-engineering when the duplication is limited and manageable.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/AnchorTitle.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/AnchorTitle.test.tsx (1)
1-641: Excellent comprehensive test coverage!This test suite provides thorough coverage of the AnchorTitle component with well-organized test categories covering rendering, props, events, accessibility, edge cases, and integrations. The tests follow React Testing Library best practices and maintain good test isolation.
After addressing the issues identified above (incorrect test descriptions, unnecessary eslint-disable comments, duplicate test, and incorrect hash expectation), this will be a robust test suite for the component.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/AnchorTitle.test.tsx (1)
594-602: Remove redundant mock implementationThe slugify mock implementation here is identical to the one defined globally at lines 11-17. This redefinition is unnecessary.
- // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-require-imports - const slugifyMock = require('utils/slugify').default - slugifyMock.mockImplementation((str: string) => - str - .toLowerCase() - .replace(/[^a-z0-9]/g, '-') - .replace(/-+/g, '-') - .replace(/^-|-$/g, '') - ) -
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/AnchorTitle.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithya-naik
PR: OWASP/Nest#1894
File: frontend/src/components/TopContributorsList.tsx:74-74
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T14:51:14.736Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, the maintainer adithya-naik prefers not to create separate components for code that's only used in two specific cases, following the YAGNI principle to avoid over-engineering when the duplication is limited and manageable.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/AnchorTitle.test.tsx
arkid15r
previously requested changes
Aug 9, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@RizWaaN3024 please address Sonar's warning when you get a chance.
|
Hi @arkid15r |
|
kasya
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2025
9 tasks
9 tasks
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed change
Add comprehensive unit tests for the AnchorTitle component to ensure robust behavior across all use cases. This PR introduces 25+ test cases covering rendering logic, prop handling, event management, accessibility, and edge cases.
The test suite validates:
All tests use proper mocking for external dependencies including slugify utility, FontAwesome icons, and browser APIs to ensure isolated and reliable test execution.
Checklist
make check-testlocally; all checks and tests passed.