Skip to content

upstream(sync): Workflows stack — run history, reply-in-thread, editor (#5780, #6178, #6248) #274

Description

@oscarlehuu

Intent

Sync full Buzz workflow improvements — Crew has not forked workflow engine; expected clean merge.

Upstream PRs: block#5780, block#6178, block#6248

Conflict matrix

Area Risk Crew files Resolution
desktop/src/features/workflows/** Low likely untouched Take upstream wholesale
crates/buzz-workflow Low no Crew delta Take upstream
buzz-core NIP-10 parser (block#6178) Low shared Take upstream; verify thread roots in Crew harness
Playwright Low playwright.config.ts Add upstream spec globs per UPSTREAM-SYNC.md row

TDD plan

Phase 1 — RED (block#6178)

  • Add/run upstream test: reply_in_thread sets NIP-10 markers; trigger_is_reply filter
  • Command: cargo test -p buzz-workflow + workflow schema tests

Phase 2 — RED (block#5780)

  • Run history pagination + error_code contract tests
  • Desktop unit: truthful pending trace UI

Phase 3 — RED/GREEN (block#6248)

  • Editor route deep-link + dirty-exit guard tests (upstream Playwright)
  • GREEN: merge tag; NuncioCrew Gate

CI note

Workflow paths may be outside automatic Crew Gate — run manual NuncioCrew Upstream Sync if workflow crates change.

Parent

Buzz Tier 3 — promoted to Tier 2 (clean sync).

Unresolved

  • Founder priority for workflow editor UX vs automation-only

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions