-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
Update rpm package to have 256bit digests #1411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+32
−3
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | ||
| .git | ||
| /shared-* | ||
| release-v*/** |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello! I got confused by the logic communicated by this sentence: we update the digests because we run in an ubi9 container?
Just glancing over this whole topic... is the following true?
We update the centos 7 RPM packages to contain 256 bit digests because of
<some-reason-probably-compliance>and we do so by processing these RPM files in a UBI9 (rhel generation 9) container because only there we have the required tooling available.This is for my own understanding, I am not asking to change the patch :).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we originally build the packages, we do so in a
centos7container (for glibc reasons). The version ofrpmbuildavailable in this container is:which only generates
SHA1andMD5digests and does not support 256-bit digests.According to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71942026/add-sha256-digests-to-rpm-packages, support for
SHA256digests was added in4.14.3(although it may not have been the default).What we do in this case is us an intermediate container (
rpmdigests) based onnvcr.io/nvidia/cuda:13.0.1-base-ubi9(currently) with:Use
fpmto "recreate" the packages. What I assume happens is thatfpmextracts the packages and creates new packages usingrpmbuild. Since the version in the container supportsSHA256digests by default these new packages will include these. Note that the exisingSHA1andMD5digests are maintained.And yes, the reason that we do this is "compliance". There are programs like FIPS that require this and certain newer distributions (see #1307) also require this by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have updated the description with the motivation.