Skip to content

Conversation

@yashaswikarnati
Copy link
Contributor

@yashaswikarnati yashaswikarnati commented Nov 3, 2025

What does this PR do ?

Changes in 1F1B schedule to support multi module pipeline communication and unit tests

⚠️ For major changes (either in lines of code or in its impact), please make sure to first share discuss a design-doc with the team.

Contribution process

flowchart LR
    A[Pre-checks] --> B[PR Tests]
    subgraph Code Review/Approval
        C1[Expert Review] --> C2[Final Review]
    end
    B --> C1
    C2 --> D[Merge]
Loading

Pre-checks

  • I want this PR in a versioned release and have added the appropriate Milestone (e.g., Core 0.8)
  • I have added relevant unit tests
  • I have added relevant functional tests
  • I have added proper typing to my code Typing guidelines
  • I have added relevant documentation
  • I have run the autoformatter.sh on my PR

Code review

The following process is enforced via the CODEOWNERS file for changes into megatron/core. For changes outside of megatron/core, it is up to the PR author whether or not to tag the Final Reviewer team.

For MRs into `main` branch

(Step 1): Add PR label Expert Review

(Step 2): Collect the expert reviewers reviews

  1. Attach the Expert Review label when your PR is ready for review.
  2. GitHub auto-assigns expert reviewers based on your changes. They will get notified and pick up your PR soon.

⚠️ Only proceed to the next step once all reviewers have approved, merge-conflict are resolved and the CI is passing.
Final Review might get declined if these requirements are not fulfilled.

(Step 3): Final Review

  1. Add Final Review label
  2. GitHub auto-assigns final reviewers based on your changes. They will get notified and pick up your PR soon.

(Optional Step 4): Cherry-pick into release branch

If this PR also needs to be merged into core_r* release branches, after this PR has been merged, select Cherry-pick to open a new PR into the release branch.

For MRs into `dev` branch The proposed review process for `dev` branch is under active discussion.

MRs are mergable after one approval by either [email protected] or [email protected].

Merging your PR

Any member of core-adlr and core-nemo will be able to merge your PR.

@yashaswikarnati yashaswikarnati requested review from a team as code owners November 3, 2025 00:32
@ko3n1g ko3n1g added this to the Core 0.16 milestone Nov 3, 2025
@yashaswikarnati yashaswikarnati changed the title Yash/dev 1f1b multimodule pipelining [Dev] Changes to support multimodule pipelining Nov 3, 2025
@yashaswikarnati yashaswikarnati requested a review from a team November 3, 2025 00:36
@lhb8125
Copy link

lhb8125 commented Nov 6, 2025

Please add label "expert review" when this PR is ready, or the reviewers won't get notifications.

@Victarry Victarry added the dev branch Dev branch related issues and development label Nov 7, 2025
@skyw skyw removed their request for review November 12, 2025 16:24
@yanring yanring requested a review from shifangx November 13, 2025 00:56
@yanring yanring changed the title [Dev] Changes to support multimodule pipelining [Dev][Draft] Changes to support multimodule pipelining Nov 13, 2025
@yashaswikarnati yashaswikarnati changed the title [Dev][Draft] Changes to support multimodule pipelining [Dev] Changes to support multimodule pipelining Nov 13, 2025
@yashaswikarnati yashaswikarnati added the Expert Review Apply this label to indicate that your PR is ready for expert review. label Nov 13, 2025
@yanring
Copy link
Contributor

yanring commented Nov 13, 2025

Hi @yashaswikarnati, please include the main PR link in the desc.

@yashaswikarnati
Copy link
Contributor Author

yashaswikarnati commented Nov 13, 2025

Hi @yashaswikarnati, please include the main PR link in the desc.

#2031 (this needs to go in first)

@yanring we cant yet create an MR to main as the one before this is not merged to main yet. Could we continue with the review and in the meanwhile we can create an MR to main

@shifangx
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @yashaswikarnati, could you please add some documentation to this PR?
For example, you could include some excerpts from the design document. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17FU3-CEAzob6lR40AY3LVCy57HHPsZZny8K4Z78l7ug/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.bh7bns6bwmiq

@yashaswikarnati
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yanring @lhb8125 gentle reminder on the review

@yanring
Copy link
Contributor

yanring commented Nov 19, 2025

@yanring @lhb8125 gentle reminder on the review

Thanks for the reminder. I'm actually waiting for a review from @lhb8125 and @shifangx to help take a look

return [_ensure_3d_tensor(t) for t in tensor]
if isinstance(tensor, torch.Tensor) and tensor.ndim == 2:
return tensor.unsqueeze(-1)
return tensor
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we sure that the tensor must be 2D or 3D? Should we catch some exception here?

return input_tensor_grad


def _backward_step_dict(
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we move the logic of parsing input and output dict outside of the backward_step()?

@lhb8125
Copy link

lhb8125 commented Nov 19, 2025

@yashaswikarnati Could you add a brief description of the overall roadmap? I think this is a big feature that contains several MRs, so which one has been merged and which one is WIP? What's the role of the current PR in the whole feature?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dev branch Dev branch related issues and development Expert Review Apply this label to indicate that your PR is ready for expert review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants