Skip to content

Conversation

@tdene
Copy link
Contributor

@tdene tdene commented Oct 28, 2025

What does this PR do ?

Updates RL's interface with the inference framework.

Contribution process

flowchart LR
    A[Pre-checks] --> B[PR Tests]
    subgraph Code Review/Approval
        C1[Expert Review] --> C2[Final Review]
    end
    B --> C1
    C2 --> D[Merge]
Loading

Pre-checks

  • I want this PR in a versioned release and have added the appropriate Milestone (e.g., Core 0.8)
  • I have added relevant unit tests
  • I have added relevant functional tests
  • I have added proper typing to my code Typing guidelines
  • I have added relevant documentation
  • I have run the autoformatter.sh on my PR

Code review

The following process is enforced via the CODEOWNERS file for changes into megatron/core. For changes outside of megatron/core, it is up to the PR author whether or not to tag the Final Reviewer team.

For MRs into `main` branch

(Step 1): Add PR label Expert Review

(Step 2): Collect the expert reviewers reviews

  1. Attach the Expert Review label when your PR is ready for review.
  2. GitHub auto-assigns expert reviewers based on your changes. They will get notified and pick up your PR soon.

⚠️ Only proceed to the next step once all reviewers have approved, merge-conflict are resolved and the CI is passing.
Final Review might get declined if these requirements are not fulfilled.

(Step 3): Final Review

  1. Add Final Review label
  2. GitHub auto-assigns final reviewers based on your changes. They will get notified and pick up your PR soon.

(Optional Step 4): Cherry-pick into release branch

If this PR also needs to be merged into core_r* release branches, after this PR has been merged, select Cherry-pick to open a new PR into the release branch.

For MRs into `dev` branch The proposed review process for `dev` branch is under active discussion.

MRs are mergable after one approval by either [email protected] or [email protected].

Merging your PR

Any member of core-adlr and core-nemo will be able to merge your PR.

@tdene tdene requested review from a team as code owners October 28, 2025 15:04
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@tdene tdene force-pushed the tde/rl_4_out_of_4 branch from 1ac9df6 to f93bd12 Compare October 29, 2025 09:52
@ko3n1g ko3n1g added this to the Core 0.16 milestone Oct 29, 2025
@tdene tdene marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2025 16:02
@tdene tdene removed the request for review from a team November 20, 2025 23:06
@tdene tdene added Expert Review Apply this label to indicate that your PR is ready for expert review. Run tests labels Nov 20, 2025
model,
optimizer,
args.enable_cuda_graph,
args.cuda_graph_impl == "local",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It'll be better to send the implementation in there instead of the boolean flag and set the cuda graphs to the particular implementation instead of hardcoding it to 'local'.

async def resume(self):
if dist.get_rank() == 0:
self._client.unpause_engines()
#await self._inference_engine.running.wait()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove?


if dist.get_rank() == 0:
self._client.pause_engines()
#await self._inference_engine.paused.wait()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Expert Review Apply this label to indicate that your PR is ready for expert review. Run tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants