Skip to content

TSF-SKR Tumour Replaced by the TSF-ASN Owl#3791

Open
pizzay30tyd wants to merge 6 commits intoMonolith-Station:mainfrom
pizzay30tyd:owl
Open

TSF-SKR Tumour Replaced by the TSF-ASN Owl#3791
pizzay30tyd wants to merge 6 commits intoMonolith-Station:mainfrom
pizzay30tyd:owl

Conversation

@pizzay30tyd
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pizzay30tyd pizzay30tyd commented Apr 14, 2026

About the PR

Added the TSF-Owl, a new TSF ship fitted with one mech bay and incredible stealth capabilities at the cost of lacking armor and armaments.

Why / Balance

No TSF ships have mech support other than the Flyssa, this fills in a small niche for that. Tumour is also most likely the least used ship in the TSFMC Shipyard.

Stealth stats when in “parked” stealth mode: (should probably double check cause the heat system is a bit wonky)
Handheld mass scanner: visible at 300 meters (no thermal sig)
Shuttle/Gunnery Console: visible at 430 meters (no thermal sig)
Advanced Radar: visible at 650 meters (no thermal sig)
Elite Radar: visible at 870 meters (no thermal sig)
Overwatch Radar: visible at 1700 meters (no thermal sig)

Media

Tumour
tumour

Owl
owl-0 copy

Radar Signature
Screenshot 2026-04-14 at 16 40 18
Button Showcase
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/df868cc4-ed60-4e80-8c26-fb4e85850bd5

Requirements

  • I have read relevant guidelines/documentation to this PR found on our devwiki.
  • I have added media to this PR or it does not require an ingame showcase.
  • I can confirm this PR contains either no AI-generated content, or AI-generated content that meets our guidelines.

How to test

open localhost
mapping 1000
loadgrid 1000 /Maps/_Mono/Shuttles/Nfsd/owl.yml
mapinit 1000

Breaking changes

Changelog

🆑

  • remove: TSF-SKR Tumour is removed
  • add: Added the TSF-ASN Owl, a small stealthy mech carrier.

@monolith8319 monolith8319 changed the title TSF-SKR Tumour replaced by the TSF-ASN Owl TSF-SKR Tumour Replaced by the TSF-ASN Owl Apr 14, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added size/XL and removed size/L labels Apr 14, 2026
@pizzay30tyd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ok i broke it with latest commit but im too lazy to fix rn wait like a day pls

@github-actions github-actions Bot added size/L and removed size/XL labels Apr 14, 2026
@pizzay30tyd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

fixed everything, rearranged engine room to have way more space and overall make the ship look a bit more balanced

@Mapleflavoureds
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Mapleflavoureds commented Apr 16, 2026

tumour-0 tumour as of now

It's main gimmick is its inbuilt shipyard, which does have some decent hit and run option that don't see much time of day.

I like its little stupid ships, despite their relative inutility.

@pizzay30tyd pizzay30tyd marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2026 09:07
@pizzay30tyd pizzay30tyd marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2026 09:07
@ThanosDeGraf
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The stealth mode is cool! More ships should come equipped with a way to reduce their thermal sig.

I agree with Rover here though, ships with built-in mini shipyards are fun but rare, so removing the tumor feels like a shame. Small fighters that have a solar wing for power would be cool, no?

@pizzay30tyd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Yeah I guess I could change the PR to just be “Added TSF-ASN Owl” since it is a unique enough ship given the severe lack of mech carriers TSF has, let alone stealth ones.
Sadly stealth ships for active ship combat kind of aren’t viable with the current thermal signature system cause using thrusters/firing weapons massively increases your thermal sig so they’d only really be good for pre-planned ambushes where the enemy drives into you so solar powered fighters for Tumour would be kind of niche
Would be nice to see a proper Tumour replacement/remap though given how rarely it is used despite it being a very unique ship.
Maybe the Tumour could be remapped to a proper stealth carrier where it still serves its role as a fighter carrier whilst being hard to find?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants