Update groups-concept.md #1654
Update groups-concept.md #1654
Conversation
We have removed the following item from the Known Issues section: ------------ If an administrator role is assigned to a role-assignable group instead of individual users, members of the group won't be able to access Rules, Organization, or Public Folders in the new Exchange admin center. The workaround is to assign the role directly to users instead of the group. ------------ After investigating the matter in collaboration with the EXO team, we confirmed that it is now possible to access Public Folders and Rules even when roles are assigned to groups.
|
@fumika3104 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 3367038: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
|
@fumika3104 This pull request was opened in the public repo. PMs should work in the private repo, per the Microsoft Docs contributor guide. We can keep this PR open for review and merge, but would you make future content updates in the private repo? Thank you! Can you review the proposed changes? Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #label:"aq-pr-triaged" |
|
@barclayn Could you review this proposed update to your article and enter Thanks! |
We have removed the following item from the Known Issues section:
If an administrator role is assigned to a role-assignable group instead of individual users, members of the group won't be able to access Rules, Organization, or Public Folders in the new Exchange admin center. The workaround is to assign the role directly to users instead of the group. ------------
After investigating the matter in collaboration with the EXO team, we confirmed that it is now possible to access Public Folders and Rules even when roles are assigned to groups.