Skip to content

Update groups-concept.md #1609

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rodrigooliani
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the Known issues with the following information:

Guest accounts that are owners of a PIM-enabled group will face restricted access when their guest access is configured as "Guest users have limited access to properties and memberships of directory objects" or "Guest user access is restricted to properties and memberships of their own directory objects (most restrictive)." These accounts will experience limitations when participating in "Privileged Identity Management" activities within the group. They won't be able to determine if the group is already enabled for PIM and will instead see a prompt asking, "Enable PIM for this group?" Furthermore, limited/restricted guest accounts will lack visibility into activated roles for other users.

Updated the Known issues with the following information: 

Guest accounts that are owners of a PIM-enabled group will face restricted access when their guest access is configured as "Guest users have limited access to properties and memberships of directory objects" or "Guest user access is restricted to properties and memberships of their own directory objects (most restrictive)." These accounts will experience limitations when participating in "Privileged Identity Management" activities within the group. They won't be able to determine if the group is already enabled for PIM and will instead see a prompt asking, "Enable PIM for this group?" Furthermore, limited/restricted guest accounts will lack visibility into activated roles for other users.
Copy link
Contributor

@rodrigooliani : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 907820d:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/identity/role-based-access-control/groups-concept.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ The following are known issues with role-assignable groups:
- Use the new [Exchange admin center](/exchange/exchange-admin-center) for role assignments via dynamic membership groups. The old Exchange admin center doesn't support this feature. If accessing the old Exchange admin center is required, assign the eligible role directly to the user (not via role-assignable groups). Exchange PowerShell cmdlets work as expected.
- If an administrator role is assigned to a role-assignable group instead of individual users, members of the group won't be able to access Rules, Organization, or Public Folders in the new [Exchange admin center](/exchange/exchange-admin-center). The workaround is to assign the role directly to users instead of the group.
- Azure Information Protection Portal (the classic portal) doesn't recognize role membership via group yet. You can [migrate to the unified sensitivity labeling platform](/azure/information-protection/configure-policy-migrate-labels) and then use the Microsoft Purview compliance portal to use group assignments to manage roles.
- Guest accounts that are owners of a PIM-enabled group will face restricted access when their guest access is configured as "Guest users have limited access to properties and memberships of directory objects" or "Guest user access is restricted to properties and memberships of their own directory objects (most restrictive)." These accounts will experience limitations when participating in "Privileged Identity Management" activities within the group. They won't be able to determine if the group is already enabled for PIM and will instead see a prompt asking, "Enable PIM for this group?" Furthermore, limited/restricted guest accounts will lack visibility into activated roles for other users.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Guest accounts that are owners of a PIM-enabled group will face restricted access when their guest access is configured as "Guest users have limited access to properties and memberships of directory objects" or "Guest user access is restricted to properties and memberships of their own directory objects (most restrictive)." These accounts will experience limitations when participating in "Privileged Identity Management" activities within the group. They won't be able to determine if the group is already enabled for PIM and will instead see a prompt asking, "Enable PIM for this group?" Furthermore, limited/restricted guest accounts will lack visibility into activated roles for other users.
- Guest accounts that are owners of a Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enabled group will face restricted access when their guest access is configured as "Guest users have limited access to properties and memberships of directory objects" or "Guest user access is restricted to properties and memberships of their own directory objects (most restrictive)." These accounts will experience limitations when participating in PIM activities within the group. They won't be able to determine if the group is already enabled for PIM and will instead see a prompt asking, "Enable PIM for this group?" Furthermore, limited/restricted guest accounts will lack visibility into activated roles for other users.

@v-regandowner
Copy link
Contributor

@barclayn - Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants