issue: 4409248 Fix RoCE LAG warning

[BasharRadya]

User description

We cannot disable RoCE LAG (deprecated option in OFED 5.1).

Change type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Tests
• Other

Check list

• Code follows the style de facto guidelines of this project
• Comments have been inserted in hard to understand places
• Documentation has been updated (if necessary)
• Test has been added (if possible)

---

PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement

---

Description

• Removed deprecated RoCE LAG disable path references.

• Simplified print_roce_lag_warnings function signature and logic.

• Updated RoCE LAG warning messages for clarity and relevance.

• Adjusted related function calls to match updated signature.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

net_device_val.cpp Adjusted RoCE LAG warning logic and function calls              src/core/dev/net_device_val.cpp Removed disable_path parameter from print_roce_lag_warnings calls. Adjusted function calls to match updated signature. Simplified logic for RoCE LAG warning handling. +2/-3      utils.cpp Simplified `print_roce_lag_warnings` and updated messages src/core/util/utils.cpp Removed disable_path parameter from print_roce_lag_warnings. Updated warning messages for clarity and removed deprecated instructions. Simplified logic in the warning function. +3/-10    utils.h Updated `print_roce_lag_warnings` function signature          src/core/util/utils.h Updated print_roce_lag_warnings function signature. Removed disable_path parameter from declaration. +2/-2

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[BasharRadya]

bot:retest

[BasharRadya]

bot:retest

[AlexanderGrissik]

bot:retest

[tomerdbz]

Could you please update the description to detail more about the "why"?

[tomerdbz]

/review

[tomerdbz]

/describe

[tomerdbz]

/improve

[pr-review-bot-app]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Possible Issue The function print_roce_lag_warnings is invoked without the bond_roce_lag_path argument in some cases, which may lead to incorrect behavior or missing information in the warning logs. print_roce_lag_warnings(get_ifname_link(), guid_iter->second.front().c_str(), guid_iter->second.back().c_str()); Incomplete Warning Message The updated print_roce_lag_warnings function no longer includes a message about disabling RoCE LAG or referencing the release notes, which might reduce clarity for users troubleshooting the issue. "* " PRODUCT_NAME " cannot offload the device; issue with RoCE LAG.\n");

[pr-review-bot-app]

PR Description updated to latest commit (d6567d8)

[pr-review-bot-app]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Add bounds check for safe access Verify that guid_iter->second contains at least two elements before accessing front() and back() to avoid potential out-of-bounds access. src/core/dev/net_device_val.cpp [1482-1483] -print_roce_lag_warnings(get_ifname_link(), guid_iter->second.front().c_str(), - guid_iter->second.back().c_str()); +if (guid_iter->second.size() >= 2) { + print_roce_lag_warnings(get_ifname_link(), guid_iter->second.front().c_str(), + guid_iter->second.back().c_str()); +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: Adding a bounds check ensures that the code does not attempt to access elements of guid_iter->second without verifying their existence, preventing potential out-of-bounds errors. This is a critical improvement for code safety and correctness.	High
	Validate pointer before function call Ensure that get_ifname_link() does not return a null or invalid pointer before passing it to print_roce_lag_warnings to prevent undefined behavior. src/core/dev/net_device_val.cpp [1534] -print_roce_lag_warnings(get_ifname_link()); +const char* ifname_link = get_ifname_link(); +if (ifname_link) { + print_roce_lag_warnings(ifname_link); +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: Validating the pointer returned by get_ifname_link() before using it in print_roce_lag_warnings prevents undefined behavior in case of a null or invalid pointer. This is an important safeguard for robust code execution.	Medium
General	Improve clarity of warning message Clarify the warning message to provide more actionable information about the issue with RoCE LAG for better user understanding. src/core/util/utils.cpp [183] -vlog_printf(VLOG_WARNING, "* " PRODUCT_NAME " cannot offload the device; issue with RoCE LAG.\n"); +vlog_printf(VLOG_WARNING, "* " PRODUCT_NAME " cannot offload the device due to an issue with RoCE LAG configuration. Please check the configuration and retry.\n"); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: Enhancing the warning message with more actionable information improves user understanding and usability. While this change is not critical, it contributes to better communication of issues to the user.	Low

[tomerdbz]

Small fixes. See also AI comments which are good imho.

Main issue I personally have is lacking documentation in redmine ticket, in the description and in the commit message. I can't understand as a reader the justification for the patch.

[dpressle]

bot:retest

[BasharRadya]

@tomerdbz please review in your convenient time

[BasharRadya]

bot:retest

[BasharRadya]

@tomerdbz REMINDER - i think you approved it in VMA but not in XLIO?