Skip to content

Conversation

@elbashandy
Copy link
Contributor

@elbashandy elbashandy commented Oct 6, 2020

Resolves #288
does not resolve 316

@elbashandy elbashandy force-pushed the cartesian_mesh_reader_regex branch from 89afd32 to 1a5cb87 Compare October 7, 2020 20:39
@elbashandy elbashandy requested a review from burlen October 8, 2020 17:16
Copy link
Collaborator

@burlen burlen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a couple of changes to make here.


fn = file_util.replace_timestep(baseline, check_step)
do_test = system_util.get_environment_variable_bool('TECA_DO_TEST', True)
if do_test and os.path.exists(fn):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't remove the TECA_DO_TEST feature, which can be used to automatically regenerate baselines across all tests. it has been removed here and in other tests that were modified.

variables_map &opts)
{
TECA_POPTS_SET(opts, std::string, prefix, file_name)
TECA_POPTS_SET(opts, std::string, prefix, files_regex)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We only need one of these options. Either file_name or files_regex.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add regex support to teca_cartesian_mesh_reader

3 participants