-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
Fix jupyter logger #1361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix jupyter logger #1361
Conversation
@@ -67,7 +72,7 @@ internal class IntegrationGeo : JupyterIntegration() { | |||
val generatedDf = execute( | |||
codeWithTypeCastGenerator = replCodeGeneratorImpl.process(geo.df, kProperty), | |||
expression = "(${kProperty.name}.df as DataFrame<*>)", | |||
) | |||
).let { "`" + it.toString() + "`" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"`$it`"
is a bit shorter ;P
But what does this do? It renders the DF as string and adds crs? Isn't it better to output the DF natively and output CRS as string?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering, should this be a separate module? I think it can just be part of the dataframe-jupyter module, potentially with the useExperimentalGeo
flag
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dataframe-geo is really heavy and I wouldn't like it to be a part of general dataframe
artifact, neither %use dataframe
in notebooks. So I'd really like to keep them separate
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | |||
## This file must *NOT* be checked into Version Control Systems, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to remove this file :D
What changes in terms of setup? I reckon previously we could |
@koperagen as I said above, I'd like to remove |
Removed with the latest commit |
Fixes #1155 + geodataframe jupyter fix + new geo-jupyter module