-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
fix(*): replace ApplicationTitle placeholder with the real app title #1603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
georgianastasov
wants to merge
7
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
ganastasov/fix-app-title-placeholder
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a59ceb1
fix(*): replace ApplicationTitle placeholder with the real app title
georgianastasov 2a143ea
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/IgniteUI/igniteui-cli int…
georgianastasov 583b0d3
Update packages/igx-templates/igx-ts/projects/_base/index.ts
georgianastasov 10c24ac
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/IgniteUI/igniteui-cli int…
georgianastasov f732d1a
Merge branch 'ganastasov/fix-app-title-placeholder' of https://github…
georgianastasov c6b560e
Merge branch 'master' into ganastasov/fix-app-title-placeholder
kdinev e7f62c8
Merge branch 'master' into ganastasov/fix-app-title-placeholder
kdinev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@georgianastasov Does codegen also need an update for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure actually maybe @dkalinovInfra will know better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will need to check is codegen using this placeholder, but I think it will be better to not to change the placeholedr to something as generic as 'name'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dkalinovInfra @georgianastasov It's quite possible this placeholder (check the history & see #1237) is absolutely intentionally added like that and intentionally doesn't get replaced just for CodeGen consumption. In which case changing those at all might not be a good idea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also possibly related to #1575, but the repo steps in #1603 don't explain what type is created, assuming the base which uses those. Alt solution would be to consider hiding the base from users and clearly marking it for internal use.
Mind you, those placeholders are not how this was supposed to be implemented to begin with IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So based on the discussion, it sounds like the
<%=ApplicationTitle%>placeholder is intentional for CodeGen consumption and shouldn't be changed. The real fix should be hiding "Base Project" from the user-facing template list (as described in #1575, so users never encounter these pass-through placeholders. Should I close this PR and work on #1575 instead, or is there a different approach you'd prefer?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@damyanpetev Yep, true.. I really did use the
basetemplate here, and I didn’t mention what application type gets created in the repo steps. I’ll fix the description now.