gets display_name from librespot#213
Merged
Googolplexed0 merged 2 commits intoGoogolplexed0:mainfrom Apr 26, 2026
Merged
Conversation
User to pull display_name from user profile improve Zotify class attr organization Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
Owner
Googolplexed0
left a comment
Googolplexed0
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This commit was most certainly not co-authored by Copilot
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This depends on Googolplexed0/librespot-python#2 getting pulled, as I used the new function added to make this work.
When the "unknown_user" function is called to set the display_name, instead of assigning it the id, i send the id to the new librespot function
get_user_profileto return the user display name. If the display name is already in the dictionaryUSER_DISPLAY_NAME_MAPthen it will use that instead of making another call. This should fix #206