Conversation
WalkthroughAdded a .dockerignore; rewrote Dockerfile as a two-stage, non-root build; swapped bcrypt→bcryptjs across code and tests; removed HTML-to-PDF generation; added utility functions for random Ethereum addresses; updated TypeScript/build settings and package dependencies; adjusted CI gating and admin/Redis adminjs session prefixing. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer (push/PR)
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Builder as Docker builder stage
participant Prod as Docker production stage
participant Reg as Container registry
Dev->>GH: push or pull_request
GH->>Builder: build job (npm ci, compile, npm run build && prune)
Builder-->>Prod: COPY --from=builder (with --chown)
Prod->>Reg: push image tagged with sha
Note right of GH: publish runs on push & PR\ndeploy runs only on push
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
36-36: Verify whether thepatchesfolder is needed in the production stage.The patches folder is copied to production (line 36) but is typically only required during the build process (in the builder stage). Confirm whether patches are applied at runtime or if this copy can be removed to further reduce the final image size.
If patches are not applied at runtime, remove line 36 from the production stage:
# Copy package files and install only production dependencies COPY package*.json ./ -COPY patches ./patches RUN npm ci --omit=dev
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.dockerignore(1 hunks).github/workflows/staging-pipeline.yml(0 hunks)Dockerfile(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/staging-pipeline.yml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.dockerignore (1)
1-24: Well-structured exclusion patterns for reduced build context.The .dockerignore file appropriately excludes development artifacts, CI/CD configurations, IDE settings, and build outputs, which aligns with the multi-stage Docker build optimization. This reduces the build context size and accelerates Docker builds.
Dockerfile (3)
3-27: Multi-stage build effectively reduces final image size; layer consolidation is well-executed.The refactor from single-stage to multi-stage build is the right approach for this PR objective. Builder dependencies (alpine-sdk, python3, ts-node, chromium) are correctly isolated to the builder stage and not included in the final image. Consolidating RUN commands (lines 12–18) also reduces layer bloat, and the use of
npm ci --omit=dev(line 38) ensures only production dependencies are installed.Also applies to: 30-49
44-49: Non-root user implementation is correct and improves security.The addition of a dedicated non-root user (nodejs, UID 1001) with proper directory ownership and the switch to that user at runtime (line 49) follows Docker security best practices.
1-49: Verification confirmed: Entry point is properly defined.The official node:20.11.0-alpine3.18 base image provides both an ENTRYPOINT and a default CMD. Additionally, the docker-compose configurations (production, staging, and local) all explicitly override the command with application-specific entry points (e.g.,
npm run start:docker:server). The container will function correctly whether run through docker-compose or directly from the base image.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/staging-pipeline.yml(1 hunks)Dockerfile(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/staging-pipeline.yml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Dockerfile (4)
12-18: Good layer consolidation for image size reduction.Combining the
apk add,npm ci, andnpm i -g ts-nodecommands into a single RUN instruction reduces intermediate layers and improves cache efficiency. This directly supports the PR's goal of optimizing container size.
27-27: Good pruning strategy.Adding
npm prune --omit=devafter the build removes dev dependencies from the production image, directly contributing to the container size reduction goal.
36-44: Strong security hardening with non-root user.Creating a dedicated non-root user (nodejs, UID 1001) and applying proper ownership to copied artifacts significantly improves the security posture. Running containers as non-root prevents privilege escalation risks.
1-44: Verify that CMD or ENTRYPOINT is specified elsewhere.The Dockerfile ends at the USER directive without an explicit CMD or ENTRYPOINT. If the original Dockerfile contained these, they may need to be preserved in the production stage. Verify that the application entry point is correctly defined, either in this Dockerfile or inherited through a base image/docker-compose configuration.
Dockerfile
Outdated
| # Add non-root user for security before copying files with ownership | ||
| RUN addgroup -g 1001 -S nodejs && adduser -S nodejs -u 1001 | ||
|
|
||
| # Copy built files from builder stage (assign ownership to non-root user) | ||
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/node_modules ./node_modules | ||
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/build ./build | ||
| COPY --chown=nodejs:nodejs migration ./migration |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing --from=builder flag on line 42.
Lines 40–41 correctly copy artifacts from the builder stage using --from=builder, but line 42 omits this flag. The migration directory will be copied from the build context instead of the builder stage, which is inconsistent and likely incorrect.
Apply this diff to fix the COPY instruction:
-COPY --chown=nodejs:nodejs migration ./migration
+COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/migration ./migration📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Add non-root user for security before copying files with ownership | |
| RUN addgroup -g 1001 -S nodejs && adduser -S nodejs -u 1001 | |
| # Copy built files from builder stage (assign ownership to non-root user) | |
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/node_modules ./node_modules | |
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/build ./build | |
| COPY --chown=nodejs:nodejs migration ./migration | |
| # Add non-root user for security before copying files with ownership | |
| RUN addgroup -g 1001 -S nodejs && adduser -S nodejs -u 1001 | |
| # Copy built files from builder stage (assign ownership to non-root user) | |
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/node_modules ./node_modules | |
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/build ./build | |
| COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs /usr/src/app/migration ./migration |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Dockerfile around lines 36 to 42, the COPY for the migration directory is
missing the --from=builder flag so it pulls from the build context instead of
the builder stage; change the COPY to pull migration from the builder stage and
preserve ownership (i.e., use COPY --from=builder --chown=nodejs:nodejs
/usr/src/app/migration ./migration).
…ded helper functions from test utils
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/utils/utils.ts (1)
486-498: Utility functions correctly implemented.The
generateRandomEtheriumAddressandgenerateHexNumberfunctions are correctly implemented for generating random Ethereum-style addresses and hex strings. The address format (0x prefix + 40 hex characters) matches the Ethereum address specification.Note: There's a minor typo in the function name - "Etherium" should be "Ethereum" - but since this code is being moved rather than newly written, changing it now would require updates across all existing usage sites.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
Dockerfile(2 hunks)migration/1681125863016-create_some_test_admi_users.ts(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)src/adapters/chainvine/chainvineMockAdapter.ts(1 hunks)src/ormconfig.ts(1 hunks)src/services/userService.test.ts(1 hunks)src/utils/utils.ts(2 hunks)test/testUtils.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- tsconfig.json
- migration/1681125863016-create_some_test_admi_users.ts
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/services/userService.test.ts (3)
10-17: LGTM: Import consolidation looks clean.The consolidated imports are well-organized, and moving
generateRandomEtheriumAddressandgenerateRandomStringto shared utils improves code reusability.
108-111: LGTM: bcryptjs usage in tests is correct.The migration from
bcrypttobcryptjsis a drop-in replacement, and the usage ofbcrypt.hash()with the salt rounds from the environment is correct. The tests should continue to function as expected.Also applies to: 123-126
24-24: ****The premise of this review is flawed. Both
userService.ts(line 7) anduserService.test.ts(line 24) use identical CommonJSrequire()for bcryptjs with matching eslint-disable comments. This is a consistent codebase pattern, not a test-file-specific deviation. Changing only the test file would create an inconsistency between the test and its implementation rather than resolve one. If bcryptjs requires ES6 import conversion for consistency, that change should apply to both files uniformly.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
package.json (1)
27-27: Good choice replacing bcrypt with bcryptjs.The switch from
bcrypttobcryptjseliminates native compilation requirements, which reduces Docker image complexity and improves cross-platform compatibility.Dockerfile (2)
36-44: Excellent security hardening with non-root user.The addition of a dedicated
nodejsuser (UID/GID 1001) and explicit ownership assignment during file copying significantly improves the container's security posture. Running as non-root is a Docker best practice that limits potential damage from container breakouts.
11-18: Good layer optimization with consolidated RUN command.Combining package installation steps into a single RUN layer reduces image size and build time by minimizing the number of intermediate layers.
src/adapters/chainvine/chainvineMockAdapter.ts (1)
1-5: Good refactoring moving test helpers to shared utilities.Moving
generateRandomEtheriumAddressandgenerateHexNumberfrom test utilities to shared utilities improves code organization and makes these helpers available across the codebase without depending on test-specific modules.test/testUtils.ts (1)
47-50: Refactoring completed successfully.The import of
generateHexNumberandgenerateRandomEtheriumAddressfrom shared utilities completes the code organization improvement, removing duplicate implementations and establishing a single source of truth for these helper functions.src/ormconfig.ts (1)
32-36: Migrations are automatically included in the production build via TypeScript compilation.The concern is already addressed by the existing configuration. The
tsconfig.jsonhasrootDir: "./"andoutDir: "./build", and themigration/directory is not excluded. When the build script runstsc, TypeScript will automatically compile all migration files frommigration/*.tstobuild/migration/*.js, satisfying the production configuration's expectation ofbuild/migration/*.js.No additional action is required—the current setup correctly includes migrations in the compiled build output.
package.json
Outdated
| "pg": "^8.16.3", | ||
| "rate-limit-redis": "^4.2.0", | ||
| "redis": "^4.7.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify new database client dependencies are actually used.
The additions of pg (PostgreSQL client) and redis appear in dependencies, but it's unclear if they're replacing existing clients or adding new functionality. The codebase may already use ioredis (line 55) for Redis connectivity.
Run the following script to check if these new dependencies are imported and used:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for pg and redis usage in source code
echo "=== Checking for 'pg' usage ==="
rg -n --type=ts "from ['\"]pg['\"]|require\(['\"]pg['\"]" src/
echo -e "\n=== Checking for 'redis' usage ==="
rg -n --type=ts "from ['\"]redis['\"]|require\(['\"]redis['\"]" src/
echo -e "\n=== Existing ioredis usage ==="
rg -n --type=ts "from ['\"]ioredis['\"]|require\(['\"]ioredis['\"]" src/ | head -5Length of output: 161
I need to conduct a more comprehensive check to confirm whether these packages are truly unused throughout the entire codebase:
Let me verify if rate-limit-redis is actually being used in the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for rate-limit-redis usage
echo "=== Checking for rate-limit-redis usage ==="
rg -n --type=ts "from ['\"]rate-limit-redis['\"]|require\(['\"]rate-limit-redis['\"]" src/
echo -e "\n=== Checking for any redis store or rate limiter setup ==="
rg -n --type=ts "RedisStore|RateLimiter" src/ | head -20
echo -e "\n=== Checking for pg usage patterns (pool, query, etc) ==="
rg -n --type=ts "pgPool|pgClient|pg\.Pool|pg\.Client" src/ | head -10Length of output: 611
I need to check how the Redis stores are being instantiated and which Redis client is passed to them:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check RedisStore instantiation in bootstrap.ts
echo "=== RedisStore instantiation in bootstrap.ts (around line 221) ==="
sed -n '215,230p' src/server/bootstrap.ts
echo -e "\n=== connect-redis instantiation in adminJs.ts (around lines 72, 104) ==="
sed -n '70,76p' src/server/adminJs/adminJs.ts
echo "---"
sed -n '102,106p' src/server/adminJs/adminJs.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking what redis object is imported in adminJs.ts ==="
sed -n '1,50p' src/server/adminJs/adminJs.ts | grep -n "redis"Length of output: 1473
Remove unused dependencies: pg and redis packages are not imported or used.
Verification confirms both packages are unnecessary:
- pg: Zero usage detected in the codebase
- redis: The codebase uses
ioredisexclusively; bothrate-limit-redis(bootstrap.ts:221) andconnect-redis(adminJs.ts:72, 104) are configured with ioredis clients, not theredisnpm package
Remove both from dependencies in package.json lines 65-67.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around lines 65 to 67, the dependencies "pg" and "redis" are
unused and should be removed; edit package.json to delete the "pg" and "redis"
entries from the dependencies list (leaving "rate-limit-redis" intact), then run
your package manager's install (npm/yarn/pnpm) to update lockfile and verify the
project still builds and tests pass.
| "db:migrate:run:production": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:run -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js", | ||
| "db:migrate:rever:productiont": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:revert -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in migration script name.
Line 235 contains a typo: db:migrate:rever:productiont should be db:migrate:revert:production (missing 't' in "revert" and extra 't' in "production").
Apply this diff:
- "db:migrate:rever:productiont": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:revert -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js",
+ "db:migrate:revert:production": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:revert -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "db:migrate:run:production": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:run -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js", | |
| "db:migrate:rever:productiont": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:revert -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js", | |
| "db:migrate:run:production": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:run -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js", | |
| "db:migrate:revert:production": "NODE_ENV=production npx typeorm migration:revert -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js", |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around lines 234 to 235, the npm script key
"db:migrate:rever:productiont" is misspelled; rename it to
"db:migrate:revert:production" and keep the command value "NODE_ENV=production
npx typeorm migration:revert -d ./build/src/ormconfig.js" so the script name
correctly reads revert and production is spelled properly.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit